Law, Pragmatism and Constitutional Interpretation: From Information Exclusion to Information Production
Pragmatism Today 3 (1):39-57 (2012)
|Abstract||Through an analysis of the US Supreme Court's case Heller this paper argues that legal process can be pragmatically reconceptualized so as to create information necessary to decide complex social issues. This is in contrast to other more standard conceptions of law as more emphasizing what information ought to be excluded.|
|Keywords||Philosophy of Law Pragmatism Democratic Experimentalism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Susan Haack (2005). On Legal Pragmatism: Where Does 'the Path of the Law' Lead Us? American Journal of Jurisprudence 50:71-105.
Brian E. Butler (2010). Dews, Dworks, and Poses Decide Lochner. Contemporary Pragmatism 7 (2):15-44.
Susan Haack (2008). The Pluralistic Universe of Law: Towards a Neo-Classical Legal Pragmatism. Ratio Juris 21 (4):453-480.
Dan L. Burk (2008). Information Ethics and the Law of Data Representations. Ethics and Information Technology 10 (2-3):135-147.
Brian E. Butler (2002). Legal Pragmatism: Banal or Beneficial as a Jurisprudential Position? Essays in Philosophy 3 (2).
Brian E. Butler (2004). Law's Image of Pragmatism-Another Legal Fiction. Contemporary Pragmatism 1 (1):151-157.
Grant Huscroft & Bradley W. Miller (eds.) (2011). The Challenge of Originalism: Theories of Constitutional Interpretation. Cambridge University Press.
Stephen Gardbaum (2002). Review: Robert Justin Lipkin, Constitutional Revolutions: Pragmatism and the Role of Judicial Review in American Constitutionalism. [REVIEW] Ethics 112 (4):838-841.
Andrew A. Adams, Kiyoshi Murata & Yohko Orito (2009). The Japanese Sense of Information Privacy. AI and Society 24 (4):327-341.
Lawrence O. Gostin (2001). Health Information: Reconciling Personal Privacy with the Public Good of Human Health. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 9 (3):321-335.
Jacques Savoy (1993). Searching Information in Legal Hypertext Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2 (3):205-232.
John Arthur & William H. Shaw (eds.) (2010). Readings in the Philosophy of Law. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Laurens Mommers, Wim Voermans, Wouter Koelewijn & Hugo Kielman (2009). Understanding the Law: Improving Legal Knowledge Dissemination by Translating the Contents of Formal Sources of Law. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (1):51-78.
Patrick J. Glen, Why Plessy/Brown and Bowers/Lawrence Are Correct: Thomistic Natural Law as the Content of a Moral Constitutional Interpretation.
Added to index2012-07-25
Total downloads6 ( #154,676 of 722,815 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,541 of 722,815 )
How can I increase my downloads?