Graduate studies at Western
Studia Phaenomenologica 8:83-108 (2008)
|Abstract||The purpose of the present text is to show the importance of the system of relevances in respect of the analysis of the literary texts. This concept, developed by Alfred Schutz, helps not only to understand the relation between text and empirical reality as such, but it simultaneously questions the relation between reader, writer, and text. The questions raised by the status of the system of relevances help the phenomenological analysis of the literary text to achieve a better understanding of the act of signification (particularly that defined in the realm of literature) and of the status of reference. It helps also to understand how the configuration of experience as such can be modified according to the specific interaction accomplished within the act of reading|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Anders Pettersson (2012). The Concept of Literary Application: Readers' Analogies From Text to Life. Palgrave Macmillan.
Claude Romano (2008). La consistance de l'imaginaire. Studia Phaenomenologica 8:15-46.
Mark Silcox & Jon Cogburn (2006). Computability Theory and Literary Competence. British Journal of Aesthetics 46 (4):369-386.
Ashley King Scheu (2012). The Viability of the Philosophical Novel: The Case of Simone de Beauvoir's "She Came to Stay". Hypatia 27 (4):791 - 809.
Mika Hietanen (2011). The Gospel of Matthew as a Literary Argument. Argumentation 25 (1):63-86.
Antonio García Berrio (1992). A Theory of the Literary Text. W. De Gruyter.
Stein Haugom Olsen & Anders Pettersson (eds.) (2005). From Text to Literature: New Analytic and Pragmatic Approaches. Palgrave Macmillan.
George Teschner (2011). Wikies and Rethinking Author-Ity. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 18 (1):11-18.
Steven P. Scher (ed.) (1992). Music and Text: Critical Inquiries. Cambridge University Press.
Sarah Chaney (2011). “A Hideous Torture on Himself”: Madness and Self-Mutilation in Victorian Literature. [REVIEW] Journal of Medical Humanities 32 (4):279-289.
Mary F. Rogers (1984). Everyday Life as Text. Sociological Theory 2:165-186.
Anne E. Monius (2011). U. Vē. Cāminātaiyar and the Construction of Tamil Literary “Tradition”. Journal of Indian Philosophy 39 (6):589-597.
Timothy Morton (2010). Ecology as Text, Text as Ecology. Oxford Literary Review 32 (1):1-17.
Ray Paton (1997). Glue, Verb and Text Metaphors in Biology. Acta Biotheoretica 45 (1).
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-02
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?