Graduate studies at Western
Analysis 66 (290):130–135 (2006)
|Abstract||No-futurists ('growing block theorists') hold that that the past and the present are real, but that the future is not. The present moment is therefore privileged: it is the last moment of time. Craig Bourne (2002) and David Braddon-Mitchell (2004) have argued that this position is unmotivated, since the privilege of presentness comes apart from the indexicality of 'this moment'. I respond that no-futurists should treat 'x is real-as-of y' as a nonsymmetric relation. Then different moments are real-as-of different times. This reunites privilege with indexicality, but entails that no-futurists must believe in ineliminably tensed facts.|
|Keywords||No-futurism Growing block Hybrid views of time|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Klaus Held (2007). Phenomenology of 'Authentic Time' in Husserl and Heidegger. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (3):327 – 347.
Tydings Hall, Honors 229F The Problem of Time: Puzzles About Time in Philosophy, Literature, and Film TuTh 11-12:15.
Stephen David Ross (2010). Re-Membering. International Studies in Philosophy Monograph Series:43-59.
Sean Enda Power (2012). The Metaphysics of the 'Specious' Present. Erkenntnis 77 (1):121-132.
Bradford Skow (2012). Why Does Time Pass? Noûs 46 (2):223-242.
William Craig (2000). The Extent of the Present. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (2):165 – 185.
Thomas M. Crisp & Donald P. Smith (2005). 'Wholly Present' Defined. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (2):318–344.
Alexander R. Pruss (2011). The A-Theory of Time and Induction. Philosophical Studies 152 (3):335 - 345.
Steven D. Hales (2010). No Time Travel for Presentists. Logos and Episteme 1 (2):353-360.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads47 ( #27,355 of 739,304 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,476 of 739,304 )
How can I increase my downloads?