Vulgar Habits and Hume's Double Vision Argument

Journal of Scottish Philosophy 8 (2):169-187 (2010)
Abstract
In Treatise 1.4.2, David Hume seeks to explain how we come to believe in the external existence of bodies. He offers a complicated psychological account, where the imagination operates on the raw data of the senses to produce the ‘vulgar’ belief in the continued existence of the very things we sense. On behalf of philosophers, he presents a perceptual relativity argument that purports to show that the vulgar belief is false. I argue that scholars have failed to appreciate Hume's peculiar formulation of the perceptual relativity argument and its relation to his psychological account of the vulgar belief. On my interpretation, in order to account for all the premises that Hume explicitly offers, the argument is best interpreted as beginning with a reductio that opposes the effects of the senses and the imagination in the vulgar belief. Thus Hume can be interpreted as identifying an ‘antinomy’ in the habits of the vulgar mind that produce belief in bodies.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 11,404
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Tim Black (2007). The Distinction Between Coherence and Constancy in Hume's Treatise I.Iv. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (1):1 – 25.
Bryson Brown (2003). Notes on Hume and Skepticism of the Senses. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):289-303.
Dorothy P. Coleman (1984). Hume's. Hume Studies 10 (2):139-155.

View all 18 references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Fred Wilson (1988). Was Hume a Subjectivist? Philosophy Research Archives 14:247-282.
Donald C. Ainslie (2001). Hume's Reflections on the Identity and Simplicity of Mind. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62 (3):557-578.
Bryson Brown (2003). Notes on Hume and Skepticism of the Senses. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):289-303.
Jani Hakkarainen (2012). Hume's Scepticism and Realism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (2):283-309.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-18

Total downloads

19 ( #90,358 of 1,102,989 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #183,254 of 1,102,989 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.