David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (5):741-761 (2011)
The work of Arnout Geulincx (1624?1669), a Flemish Cartesian that developed a highly curious ?parallelistic? view on the universe, shows striking prima facie resemblances to Stoicism. Should we label Geulincx a reinventor of Stoic tenets, albeit within a strict Cartesian theoretical framework? To answer this question, my contribution begins by discussing relevant aspects of Stoicism and by introducing the ?existential? philosophy of Geulincx, whose metaphysical views on man brought him to adopt an ethics based upon absolute obedience and humility. It will discuss Geulincx's own views on the Stoics and, finally, compare Geulincx's philosophy with the Stoic world view. The main argument will be that, despite a deep affinity and many parallels, one crucial difference remains, as the dualism any true Cartesian metaphysics implies has important consequences for Geulincx's ethics in general and for his view on man in particular. As we will see, man plays a very peculiar role in the cosmic drama that we call the ?universe?
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
René Descartes, Valentine Rodger Miller & Reese P. Miller (1983). Principles of Philosophy. Reidel Distributed by Kluwer Boston, C1983.
Steven Nadler (1999). Knowledge, Volitional Agency and Causation in Malebranche and Geulincx. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (2):263 – 274.
Brian Cooney (1978). Arnold Geulincx: A Cartesian Idealist. Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (2):167-180.
Arnold Geulincx & Corn Verhoeven (1986). Van de Hoofddeugden de Eerste Tuchtverhandeling. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
K. H. T. (1976). The Actor and the Spectator. Review of Metaphysics 30 (1):121-122.
Stephen L. Darwall (1977). The Actor and the Spectator. Philosophia 7 (1):197-203.
Leon J. Goldstein (1976). The Actor and the Spectator. International Studies in Philosophy 8:191-191.
Lewis White Beck (1965). Agent, Actor, Spectator, and Critic. The Monist 49 (2):167-182.
Lewis White Beck (1975). The Actor and the Spectator. Yale University Press.
Lewis White Beck (1974/1998). The Actor and the Spectator: Foundations of the Theory of Human Action. Thoemmes Press.
Anthony Uhlmann (2006). Samuel Beckett and the Philosophical Image. Cambridge University Press.
Yi Wang & Fu Xiaowei (2008). Is the Unity of Goodness and Beauty the Feature of the Confucian Aesthetics? Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:273-281.
Margrethe Bruun Vaage (2008). Noël Carroll and the Role of Empathy in Fiction Film Engagement. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:263-269.
J. R. Jones (1956). Self-Knowledge, Part I. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 120:120-142.
John Glucker (2003). Stoics, Para-Stoics and Anti-Stoics: Methods and Sensibilities. Philosophia 31 (1-2):221-324.
Andreas Graeser (1972). Plotinus and the Stoics. Leiden,Brill.
Majid Yar (2000). From Actor to Spectator: Hannah Arendt's 'Two Theories' of Political Judgment. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (2):1-27.
Richard E. Crouter (1974). H. Richard Niebuhr and Stoicism. Journal of Religious Ethics 2 (2):129 - 146.
Added to index2010-11-25
Total downloads13 ( #268,671 of 1,796,538 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #205,823 of 1,796,538 )
How can I increase my downloads?