Between Actor and Spectator: Arnout Geulincx and the Stoics

The work of Arnout Geulincx (1624?1669), a Flemish Cartesian that developed a highly curious ?parallelistic? view on the universe, shows striking prima facie resemblances to Stoicism. Should we label Geulincx a reinventor of Stoic tenets, albeit within a strict Cartesian theoretical framework? To answer this question, my contribution begins by discussing relevant aspects of Stoicism and by introducing the ?existential? philosophy of Geulincx, whose metaphysical views on man brought him to adopt an ethics based upon absolute obedience and humility. It will discuss Geulincx's own views on the Stoics and, finally, compare Geulincx's philosophy with the Stoic world view. The main argument will be that, despite a deep affinity and many parallels, one crucial difference remains, as the dualism any true Cartesian metaphysics implies has important consequences for Geulincx's ethics in general and for his view on man in particular. As we will see, man plays a very peculiar role in the cosmic drama that we call the ?universe?
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09608788.2010.524755
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,570
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Steven Nadler (1999). Knowledge, Volitional Agency and Causation in Malebranche and Geulincx. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 7 (2):263 – 274.
Brian Cooney (1978). Arnold Geulincx: A Cartesian Idealist. Journal of the History of Philosophy 16 (2):167-180.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
K. H. T. (1976). The Actor and the Spectator. Review of Metaphysics 30 (1):121-122.
Leon J. Goldstein (1976). The Actor and the Spectator. International Studies in Philosophy 8:191-191.
Margrethe Bruun Vaage (2008). Noël Carroll and the Role of Empathy in Fiction Film Engagement. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 1:263-269.
J. R. Jones (1956). Self-Knowledge, Part I. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 120:120-142.
Richard E. Crouter (1974). H. Richard Niebuhr and Stoicism. Journal of Religious Ethics 2 (2):129 - 146.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

13 ( #296,358 of 1,938,465 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

3 ( #214,500 of 1,938,465 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.