Medicine as a human science between the singularity of the patient and technical scientific reproducibility
Poiesis and Praxis 1 (3):171-184 (2003)
|Abstract||The often-emphasized tension between the singularity of the patient and technicalâscientific reproducibility in medicine cannot be resolved without a discussion of the epistemological and methodological status of the human sciences. On the one hand, the rules concerning human action are analogous to the scientific laws of nature. They are de facto sufficiently stable to allow predictions and explanations similar to those of experimental sciences. From this point of view, it is only a trivial truth, but still a methodological irrelevancy, that the patient and the doctorâpatient relationship represent an ontologically irreproducible reality. On the other hand, however, one can never exclude that one can fail in the application of "laws" of the human sciences to the individual patient, for such laws are by no means wholly separated from a patient's personal-hermeneutic mediation, and can at any time be revoked by becoming aware of them. This requires a synergistic collaboration of clinical and statistical methods, and shows a methodologically relevant sense in which one cannot disregard the singularity of the patient. The reason for the crucial role of the patient's singularity in medicine is every individual patient's capacity to revoke, in principle, routines and quasi-automatisms, even though the personal mediation by the patient's consciousness de facto changes them in such a small degree that predictions and explanations modeled in experimental science remain possible|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Marco Buzzoni (2003). On Medicine as a Human Science. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 24 (1).
Richard T. Hull (1985). Informed Consent: Patient's Right or Patient's Duty? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (2):183-198.
Jurrit Bergsma (1994). Illness, the Mind, and the Body: Cancer and Immunology: An Introduction. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (4).
Matt James (2010). Patient, Heal Thyself: How the New Medicine Puts the Patient in Charge, Robert M. Veatch. Oxford University Press, 2008. 304 Pages. Hardback. ISBN 978-0-19-531372-7. RRP: £16.99. [REVIEW] Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (1):123-126.
P. Burcher (2012). The Noncompliant Patient: A Kantian and Levinasian Response. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):74-89.
Marian Rabinowitz (1980). Medicine as a Trade. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 1 (3):255-261.
James E. Rosenberg & Bernard Towers (1986). The Practice of Empathy as a Prerequisite for Informed Consent. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (2).
George W. Rainbolt (1987). Competition and the Patient-Centered Ethic. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (1):85-99.
Thomas A. Long (1986). Narrative Unity and Clinical Judgment. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (1).
Christina M. van Der Feltz-Cornelis (2002). The Impact of Factitious Disorder on the Physician-Patient Relationship. An Epistemological Model. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 5 (3):253-261.
Nelly Tsouyopoulos (1994). Postmodernist Theory and the Physician-Patient Relationship. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (3).
John J. F. Peppin (1999). Business Ethics and Health Care: The Re-Emerging Institution-Patient Relationship. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (5):535 – 550.
Erich H. Loewy (2005). In Defense of Paternalism. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 26 (6):445-468.
Jos V. M. Welie (1995). Viktor Emil Von Gebsattel on the Doctor-Patient Relationship. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (1).
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads3 ( #202,107 of 549,663 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 549,663 )
How can I increase my downloads?