Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1016-1017 (1999)
|Abstract||The distinction between regular and irregular morphology is not clear-cut enough to suggest two distinct modular structures. Instead, regularity is tied directly to the type frequency of a pattern. Evidence from experiments as well as from naturally occurring sound change suggests that even regular forms have lexical storage. Finally, the development trajectory entailed by the dual-processing model is much more complex than that entailed by associative network models.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Davide Pisani, Michael J. Benton & Mark Wilkinson (2007). Congruence of Morphological and Molecular Phylogenies. Acta Biotheoretica 55 (3).
Marc F. Joanisse & Todd R. Haskell (1999). The Dual-Mechanism Model of Inflectional Morphology: A Connectionist Critique. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1026-1027.
Thomas F. M.ü, Antoni Rodriguez-Fornells nte & Marta Kutas (1999). One, Two, or Many Mechanisms? The Brain's Processing of Complex Words. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1031-1032.
Joseph Shimron, Iris Berent & Stephen Pinker, Default Nominal Inﬂection in Hebrew: Evidence for Mental Variables.
Wolfgang U. Dressler (1999). Why Collapse Morphological Concepts? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1021-1021.
Alessandro Laudanna (1999). Regular Versus Irregular Inflection: A Question of Levels. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1029-1030.
Margherita Orsolini (1999). On the Cross-Linguistic Validity of a Dual-Mechanism Model. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (6):1033-1035.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #202,107 of 550,802 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,425 of 550,802 )
How can I increase my downloads?