God, Design, and Naturalism: Implications of Methodological Naturalism in Science for Science–Religion Relation
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Pensamiento 64 (242):621-38 (2008)
The aim of this paper is to analyze the implications flowing from adopting methodological naturalism in science, with special emphasis on the relation between science and religion. Methodological naturalism, denying supernatural and teleological explanations, influences the content of scientific theories, and in practice leads to vision of science as compatible with ontological naturalism and in opposition to theism. Ontological naturalism in turn justifies the acceptance of methodological naturalism as the best method to know the reality. If we accept realistic interpretation of scientific theories, then methodological naturalism conflicts science with religion. Theistic evolution does not seem to be a proper way to reconcile Darwinism and methodological naturalism with theism. Many of such propositions are boiled down to deism. Although evolution can be interpreted theistically, it is not the way in which majority of modern scientists and respectable scientific institutions understand it.
|Keywords||methodological naturalism ontological naturalism evolutionary theory theistic evolution teleology randomness|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Reed Richter (2002). What Science Can and Cannot Say: The Problems with Methodological Naturalism. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 22 (Jan-Apr 2002):18-22.
Alexander Paseau (2008). Naturalism in the Philosophy of Mathematics. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
William Dembski, Can Functional Logic Take the Place of Intelligent Design? A Response to Walter Thorson.
Alvin Plantinga (1997). Methodological Naturalism. Origins and Design 18 (1):18-27.
S. Muhammad-Taqīy Mudarrisī (2011). Methodology of Augustinian Science. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities (69):7-39.
S. Muhammad-Taqīy Mudarrisī (2011). Augustinian Science: Alvin Plantinga’s Idea on Philosophizing and Scientific Theorizing Based on Religious Belief. Dissertation, Mofid University
Alexander Paseau (2010). A Puzzle About Naturalism. Metaphilosophy 41 (5):642-648.
Penelope Maddy (1995). Naturalism and Ontology. Philosophia Mathematica 3 (3):248-270.
Michael Ruse (2005). Methodological Naturalism Under Attack. South African Journal of Philosophy 24 (1):44-60.
R. Scott Smith (2011). Naturalism and Our Knowledge of Reality: Testing Religious Truth-Claims. Ashgate.
Robert Audi (2000). Philosophical Naturalism at the Turn of the Century. Journal of Philosophical Research 25:27-45.
Added to index2012-07-29
Total downloads24 ( #100,433 of 1,696,172 )
Recent downloads (6 months)21 ( #21,615 of 1,696,172 )
How can I increase my downloads?