Assessing arms makers' corporate social responsibility
Journal of Business Ethics 74 (3):201 - 217 (2007)
| Abstract | Corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become a focal point for research aimed at extending business ethics to extra-corporate issues; and as a result many companies now seek to at least appear dedicated to one or another version of CSR. This has not affected the arms industry, however. For, this industry has not been discussed in CSR literature, perhaps because few CSR scholars have questioned this industry's privileged status as an instrument of national sovereignty. But major changes in the organization of political communities call traditional views of sovereignty into question. With these considerations in mind I assess the U.S. arms industry on the basis of CSR requirements regarding the environment, social equity, profitability, and use of political power. I find that this industry fails to meet any of these four CSR requirements. Countering a claim that these failings should not be held against arms manufacturers because their products are crucial to national defense, I contend that many of these companies function not as dutiful agents of a nation-state but as politically powerful entities in their own right. So, I conclude, they should be held responsible for the foreseeable consequences that flow from use of their products. This responsibility should include civil liability and, in cases involving war crimes and violations of human rights, responsibility under international human rights standards | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,653 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesKer-Tah Hsu (2012). The Advertising Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility on Corporate Reputation and Brand Equity: Evidence From the Life Insurance Industry in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics 109 (2):189-201.
Francis Weyzig (2009). Political and Economic Arguments for Corporate Social Responsibility: Analysis and a Proposition Regarding the Csr Agenda. Journal of Business Ethics 86 (4):417 - 428.
Thomas Hanke & Wolfgang Stark (2009). Strategy Development: Conceptual Framework on Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 85:507 - 516.
Vladimir Petkoski (2007). From International Corporate Responsibility to Local CSR. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:283-295.
Edmund F. Byrne (2008). Erratum: Assessing Arms Makers' Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics 83 (3):363 -.
Junwei Shi, Haiyan Fu & Lijun Hu (2007). Social Responsibility, Social Capital, and Corporate Competitive Advantage in Transitional China. International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:377-394.
Christa Thomsen & Jakob Lauring (2008). Practicing the Business of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Perspective. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 4 (2):117-131.
Michael J. Maloni & Michael E. Brown (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility in the Supply Chain: An Application in the Food Industry. Journal of Business Ethics 68 (1):35 - 52.
Guido Palazzo & Ulf Richter (2005). CSR Business as Usual? The Case of the Tobacco Industry. Journal of Business Ethics 61 (4):387 - 401.
Edmund F. Byrne (2007). Can Arms Be Sold Responsibly in the Global Market? Social Philosophy Today 23:103-114.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads14 ( #83,010 of 548,984 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,327 of 548,984 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
