David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):709-717 (1998)
Imitation research has been hindered by (1) overly molecular analyses of behaviour that ignore hierarchical structure, and (2) attempts to disqualify observational evidence. Program-level imitation is one of a range of cognitive skills for scheduling efficient novel behaviour, in particular, enabling an individual to purloin the organization of another's behaviour for its own. To do so, the individual must perceive the underlying hierarchical schedule of the fluid action it observes and must understand the local functions of subroutines within the overall goal-directed process. Action-level imitation, copying strings of actions linearly without any such understanding, is less valuable for acquiring complex behaviour and may often have other, social functions. At present, we lack a mechanistic understanding of the abilities underlying program-level imitation that make it possible for the underlying structure of complex actions to be dissected visually and recreated in behaviour.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
M. D. Matheson & D. M. Fragaszy (1998). Imitation is Not the “Holy Grail” of Comparative Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):697-698.
Paul J. M. Jorion (1998). A Methodological Behaviourist Model for Imitation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):695-695.
Robert W. Mitchell (1998). Great Apes Imitate Actions of Others and Effects of Others' Actions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):700-700.
Naoyasu Motomura (1998). The Neural Basis of Imitative Behavior: Parietal Actions and Frontal Programs. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):700-701.
Harold D. Fishbein (1998). A Piagetian View of Imitation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):689-690.
Stefan Vogt & David Carey (1998). Toward a Microanalysis of Imitative Actions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):705-706.
Andrew Whiten (1998). How Imitators Represent the Imitated: The Vital Experiments. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):707-708.
Stan A. Kuczaj, John D. Gory & Mark J. Xitco (1998). Using Programs to Solve Problems: Imitation Versus Insight. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):695-696.
Thomas R. Zentall (1998). Insufficient Support for Either Response “Priming” or “Program-Level Imitation”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):708-709.
Merideth Gattis, Harold Bekkering & Andreas Wohlschläger (1998). When Actions Are Carved at the Joints. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (5):691-692.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads12 ( #279,812 of 1,792,064 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #463,566 of 1,792,064 )
How can I increase my downloads?