Off-campus access
Using PhilPapers from home?
Click here to configure this browser for off-campus access.
- Peter Byrne (1979). Leavis, Literary Criticism and Philosophy. British Journal of Aesthetics 19 (3):263-273.
Similar books and articles
Probes the nature of linguistic or symbolic action as it relates to specific novels, plays, and poems.
Social criticism can take on many forms ranging from theoretical exposition to non-violent protests. This paper considers literary art as a form of social criticism and uses Morrison's novel Paradise as the exemplary case to show that the confrontation of unjust ideas through social criticism is essential in building non-oppressive relations open to diversity. In this sense, social criticism is a paradigm of communication that, although often entailing conflict, ultimately aims at reconciliation. I begin with a discussion of social criticism followed by a short synopsis of the novel. I then examine the novel as social criticism focusing on a process I call "twinning." The paper ends with a critical evaluation of the power and possibilities of literary art as social criticism.
In this article I look at changes in the role of literary criticism in Russian literature since perestroika. The article draws on the research of Sergej Čuprinin and Birgit Menzel. Based on my readings of the debate among literary critics about what literary criticism is and should be, and focusing on the interrelationship in the triangle writer-critic-reader, I establish a typology of contemporary literary criticism: 1. the critic as a master of the “literary process”, 2. the critic as co-writer, 3. the critic as a guide for the reader.
No categories
Discussion of Peter Byrne, Leavis, literary criticism and philosophy
|
|
There are no threads in this forum |
Nothing in this forum yet.

