Review: Soames on Quine and Davidson [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 135 (3):439 - 449 (2007)
A discussion of Quine and <span class='Hi'>Davidson</span>, as interpreted and criticized in Scott Soames' "Philosophical Analysis in the Twentieth Century, Volume II".
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/40208920
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 16,707
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Alex Byrne (2007). Soames on Quine and Davidson. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 135 (3):439 - 449.
Alex Byrne (2007). Soames on Quine and Davidson. Philosophical Studies 135 (3):439-449.
James Pearson (2011). Distinguishing W.V. Quine and Donald Davidson. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 1 (1):1-22.
Robert Sinclair (2009). Why Quine is Not an Externalist. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:279-304.
Michael Kremer (2008). Soames on Russell's Logic: A Reply. Philosophical Studies 139 (2):209 - 212.
H. G. Callaway (1993). Review of Evnine, Donald Davidson. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 43 (October):555-560.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

11 ( #219,154 of 1,726,249 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #289,836 of 1,726,249 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.