David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Zygon 44 (4):951-964 (2009)
Antje Jackelén's Time and Eternity successfully employs the method of correlation and a close study of the question of time to enter the dialogue between science and theology. Hermeneutical attention to language is a central element of this dialogue, but we must be aware that much science is untranslatable into ordinary language; it is when we get to the bigger metaphysical assumptions of science that true dialogue begins to happen. Thus, although the method of correlation is a useful way to approach this dialogue, there is not a strict equivalence in this relationship. Theology needs science more than science needs theology. In speaking of time and God we must keep in mind the relational nature of classical Christian theism, even in its most austere forms. We should not read Enlightenment ideas of God back into the classical Christian tradition or neglect the apophatic emphasis in Christian theism, which warned against assuming knowledge of the divine nature. God's relation to time always lies beyond our understanding. Studying the effects of either the Newtonian or Einsteinian concepts of time on our theological concepts should not detract our attention from the "lived time" that characterizes human experience. Consideration of the notion of time in the Madhyamaka Buddhist tradition reminds us that we cannot control the inner reality of time and that for humans time is something to be considered pragmatically.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Philip Clayton (2001). The Problem of God in Modern Thought. Ars Disputandi 1.
Michael J. Buckley (1990). At the Origins of Modern Atheism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 28 (1):51-53.
Philip Clayton (1999). Neuroscience and the Person: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action. Notre Dame: University Notre Dame Press.
Keith Ward (2008). The Big Questions in Science and Religion. Templeton Press.
Joseph A. Bracken (2007). Space and Time From a Neo-Whiteheadian Perspective. Zygon 42 (1):41-48.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Paul Copan (2003). Craig, William Lane. God, Time, and Eternity: The Coherence of Theism II: Eternity. Review of Metaphysics 56 (3):639-640.
Jill North (2011). Time in Thermodynamics. In Criag Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford 312--350.
D. H. Mellor (1981). Real Time. Cambridge University Press.
Wolfgang Achtner (2009). Time, Eternity, and Trinity. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 51 (3):268-288.
Bruce Baugh (2011). Time, Duration and Eternity in Spinoza. Comparative and Continental Philosophy 2 (2):211-233.
Jean Greisch (1996). The Eschatology of Being and the God of Time in Heidegger. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 4 (1):17 – 42.
John R. Albright (2009). Time and Eternity: Hymnic, Biblical, Scientific, and Theological Views. Zygon 44 (4):989-996.
Antje Jackelén (2006). A Relativistic Eschatology: Time, Eternity, and Eschatology in Light of the Physics of Relativity. Zygon 41 (4):955-974.
Varadaraja V. Raman (2009). There's More to Time Than Ticking Away. Zygon 44 (4):965-975.
Added to index2009-11-26
Total downloads28 ( #134,208 of 1,790,117 )
Recent downloads (6 months)13 ( #63,760 of 1,790,117 )
How can I increase my downloads?