Journal of Academic Ethics 5 (2-4):141-152 (2007)
|Abstract||The humanities have not enjoyed preeminence in academe since the Scientific Revolution marginalized the old trivium. But they long continued to play a subordinate educational role by helping constitute the distinguishing culture of the elite. Now even this subordinate role is becoming expendable as devotees of the profit motive seek to reduce culture to technological delivery of cultural products (Noble, Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education, New York: Monthly Review Press, 2003). The result is a deliberate downsizing of the humanities as traditionally understood. Personal preferences aside, is this planned obsolescence morally defensible? Arguably not, if one appeals to traditional ethical norms. But what if its legitimacy is assessed instead according to the quite different norms of capitalism that figure so prominently in university administrators’ rationales as they embrace corporatization? The corporatization of American universities has had multiple effects, and some of these have not been entirely positive. In particular, it has had an adverse effect on the professional status and values of faculty. But how faculty respond to these changes varies according to their institutional situation.|
|Keywords||Capitalist ethics Corporatization American Universities|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Thomas K. McElhinney & Edmund D. Pellegrino (2001). The Institute on Human Values in Medicine: Its Role and Influence in the Conception and Evolution of Bioethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (4):291-317.
K. Danner Clouser (1990). Humanities in Medical Education: Some Contributions. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 15 (3):289-301.
Neil Jumonville (2002). The Cultural Politics of the Sociobiology Debate. Journal of the History of Biology 35 (3):569 - 593.
Tom Cohen (ed.) (2001). Jacques Derrida and the Humanities: A Critical Reader. Cambridge University Press.
A. Edgar & S. Pattison (2006). Need Humanities Be so Useless? Justifying the Place and Role of Humanities as a Critical Resource for Performance and Practice. Medical Humanities 32 (2):92-98.
Man Kit Chang (1998). Predicting Unethical Behavior: A Comparison of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (16):1825-1834.
Mahali Phamotse & Mike Kissack (2008). The Role of the Humanities in the Modern University: Some Historical and Philosophical Considerations. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):49-65.
Tina D. Carpenter & Jane L. Reimers (2005). Unethical and Fraudulent Financial Reporting: Applying the Theory of Planned Behavior. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 60 (2):115 - 129.
Trevor S. Harding, Matthew J. Mayhew, Cynthia J. Finelli & Donald D. Carpenter (2007). The Theory of Planned Behavior as a Model of Academic Dishonesty in Engineering and Humanities Undergraduates. Ethics and Behavior 17 (3):255 – 279.
Joseph Guiltinan (2009). Creative Destruction and Destructive Creations: Environmental Ethics and Planned Obsolescence. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 89 (1):19 - 28.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads22 ( #62,675 of 722,867 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,867 )
How can I increase my downloads?