The Legitimacy of Critical Thinking: Political Liberalism and Compulsory Schooling
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Thinking 18 (1) (2007)
This essay examines the political-philosophical legitimacy of critical thinking as an aim of compulsory education. Although critical thinking is given an important role in Norwegian educational policy, the right to demand a critical attitude from all citizens has been extensively debated in political and pedagogical philosophy the last two decades. This debate stems in large part from the late work of John Rawls. In this essay, I start by stating the case for critical thinking as an educational aim, focusing on democratic education. Next, I give an account of the challenge that Rawls’ later philosophy puts to education for critical thinking. Finally, I discuss some possible ways of responding to the Rawls. The upshot will be that some aspects of critical thinking can and must be defended as politically legitimate. However, any such defence must include a reply to the Rawlsian argument – if not, it will simply be naïve. In that sense, much Norwegian educational policy has been naïve.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Jennifer Wilson Mulnix (2010). Thinking Critically About Critical Thinking. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (5):464-479.
Kal Alston (2001). Re/Thinking Critical Thinking: The Seductions of Everyday Life. Studies in Philosophy and Education 20 (1):27-40.
Richard Paul (2012). Reflections on the Nature of Critical Thinking, Its History, Politics, and Barriers and on Its Status Across the College/UniversityCurriculum Part II. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 27 (1):5-30.
Harvey Siegel (2008). Autonomy, Critical Thinking and the Wittgensteinian Legacy: Reflections on Christopher Winch, Education, Autonomy and Critical Thinking. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):165-184.
Lori Richter (2011). Questions About Critical Thinking. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 26 (2):37-43.
Robert Ennis (1991). Critical Thinking. Teaching Philosophy 14 (1):4-18.
Barbara Thayer-Bacon (1998). Transforming and Redescribing Critical Thinking: Constructive Thinking. [REVIEW] Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (2/3):123-148.
Debbie Walsh (1989). The Goal of Critical Thinking: From Educational Ideal to Educational Reality. American Federation of Teachers, Educational Issues Dept..
Jean Toner & Michele Rountree (2003). Transformative and Educative Power of Critical Thinking. Inquiry 23 (1-2):81-85.
Carlos Saiz & Ana M. Nieto (2010). Critical Thinking: A Question of Aptitude and Attitude? Inquiry 25 (2):19-26.
Michael Gillespie (2011). Assessing Critical Thinking About Values. Inquiry 26 (1):19-28.
Steve Cady (2004). Integrating Critical Thinking Into Daily Life. Inquiry 23 (3):33-36.
Maria Sanders & Jason Moulenbelt (2011). Defining Critical Thinking. Inquiry 26 (1):38-46.
Peter Boghossian (2011). Critical Thinking and Constructivism: Mambo Dog Fish to the Banana Patch. Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (1):73-84.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-02-24
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?