Janet Radcliffe Richards on our modest proposal

Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3):141-141 (2003)
Abstract
Janet Radcliffe Richards is as always to the point and radical. We agree with her that “if it is presumptively bad to prevent sales altogether because lives will be lost . . . it is for the same reason presumptively bad to restrict the selling of organs”. Her complaint against our paper is that we are unnecessarily restrictive. John Harris indeed has argued that there are no sound ethical or philosophical reasons for objecting on principle to the sale of live tissue and organs.1 If a scheme can be devised …
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 14,242
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA
Calum MacKellar (2014). Human Organ Markets and Inherent Human Dignity. New Bioethics: A Multidisciplinary Journal of Biotechnology and the Body 20 (1):53-71.
Similar books and articles
Janet Radcliffe Richards & J. R. Lucas (1985). Discrimination. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 86:307 - 324.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-08-24

Total downloads

23 ( #116,841 of 1,699,805 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

20 ( #36,129 of 1,699,805 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.