Janet Radcliffe Richards on our modest proposal

Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (3):141-141 (2003)
Janet Radcliffe Richards is as always to the point and radical. We agree with her that “if it is presumptively bad to prevent sales altogether because lives will be lost . . . it is for the same reason presumptively bad to restrict the selling of organs”. Her complaint against our paper is that we are unnecessarily restrictive. John Harris indeed has argued that there are no sound ethical or philosophical reasons for objecting on principle to the sale of live tissue and organs.1 If a scheme can be devised …
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.29.3.141
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,914
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Janet Radcliffe Richards & J. R. Lucas (1985). Discrimination. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 86:307 - 324.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

45 ( #74,438 of 1,725,572 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

41 ( #28,521 of 1,725,572 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.