Graduate studies at Western
Hypatia 15 (1):43-63 (2000)
|Abstract||: In 1977, Michel Foucault suggested that legal approaches to rape define it as merely an act of violence, not of sexuality, and therefore not distinct from other types of assaults. I argue that rape can not be considered merely an act of violence because it is instrumental in the construction of the distinctly feminine body. Insofar as the threat of rape is ineluctably, although not determinately, associated with the development of feminine bodily comportment, rape itself holds a host of bodily and sexually specific meanings|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Lisa Campo-Engelstein (2009). Cultural Memory, Empathy, and Rape. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 16 (1):25-42.
David Archard (2007). The Wrong of Rape. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):374–393.
Claudia Card (1996). Rape as a Weapon of War. Hypatia 11 (4):5 - 18.
Ann J. Cahill (2011). In Defense of Self-Defense. Philosophical Papers 38 (3):363-380.
Debra Bergoffen (2011). Exploiting the Dignity of the Vulnerable Body: Rape as a Weapon of War. Philosophical Papers 38 (3):307-325.
Sally Scholz (2006). Just War Theory, Crimes of War, and War Rape. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 20 (1):143-157.
Keith Burgess-Jackson (ed.) (1999). A Most Detestable Crime: New Philosophical Essays on Rape. Oxford University Press.
Larry May & Robert Strikwerda (1994). Men in Groups: Collective Responsibility for Rape. Hypatia 9 (2):134 - 151.
Laura Hengehold (1994). An Immodest Proposal: Foucault, Hysterization, and the "Second Rape". Hypatia 9 (3):88 - 107.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads63 ( #17,857 of 739,352 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #37,187 of 739,352 )
How can I increase my downloads?