Trinity and Consistency

Faith and Philosophy 23 (1):45-54 (2006)
P. T. Geach has argued that it is impossible to demonstrate that the doctrine of the Trinity is consistent. I try to show why -- on a common understanding of the notion of consistency -- his reasoning is flawed and why, on Geach’s own principles, one should expect that if the doctrine of the Trinity is true then it will be possible to prove that the doctrine is consistent, and it will be possible to do this in a way that makes no appeal to the truth of any religious doctrine
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/faithphil20062313
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive James Cain, Trinity and Consistency
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Dale M. Schlitt (1984). The Whole Truth. The Owl of Minerva 15 (2):169-182.
Michael C. Rea (2009). The Trinity. In Thomas P. Flint & Michael C. Rea (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford University Press 403--429.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

58 ( #73,758 of 1,906,921 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

24 ( #28,987 of 1,906,921 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.