A connectionist defence of the inscrutability thesis
Mind and Language 15 (5):465-480 (2000)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | Cognition Connectionism Language Evans, G Quine | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links | This entry has no external links. Add one. |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesJosep E. Corbi (1993). Classical and Connectionist Models: Levels of Description. Synthese 95 (2):141-68.
William Ramsey (1997). Do Connectionist Representations Earn Their Explanatory Keep? Mind and Language 12 (1):34-66.
Berit Brogaard (2008). Inscrutability and Ontological Commitment. Philosophical Studies 141 (1):21 - 42.
Martin Davies (1991). Concepts, Connectionism, and the Language of Thought. Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Lawrence Erlbaum.
Martin Davies (1991). Concepts, Connectionism, and the Language of Thought. In W Ramsey, Stephen P. Stich & D. Rumelhart (eds.), Philosophy and Connectionist Theory. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Francisco Calvo Garzón (2003). Connectionist Semantics and the Collateral Information Challenge. Mind and Language 18 (1):77-94.
Mark Rowlands (1994). Connectionism and the Language of Thought. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (2):485-503.
James W. Garson (1994). Cognition Without Classical Architecture. Synthese 100 (2):291-306.
Francisco Calvo Garzon (2000). A Connectionist Defence of the Inscrutability Thesis. Mind and Language 15 (5):465-480.
Francisco Calvo Garzon (2000). A Connectionist Defence of the Inscrutability Thesis. Mind and Language 15 (5):465-480.
Analytics
Monthly downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
|
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads0Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
