Against consequentialist theories of virtue and vice
Utilitas 19 (2):201-219 (2007)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,631 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesChristine Swanton (2002). Thomas Hurka, Virtue, Vice, and Value: Hurka, Thomas . Virtue, Vice, and Value. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. Pp. 288. $60.00 (Cloth). [REVIEW] Ethics 113 (1):163-166.
Thomas Hurka (2010). Right Act, Virtuous Motive. In Heather D. Battaly (ed.), Virtue and Vice, Moral and Epistemic. Wiley-Blackwell.
Uriah Kriegel (forthcoming). Animal Rights: A Non‐Consequentialist Approach. In K. Petrus & M. Wild (eds.), Animal Minds and Animal Morals.
Simon Keller (2007). Virtue Ethics is Self-Effacing. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (2):221 – 231.
Heather Battaly (2010). Introduction: Virtue and Vice. Metaphilosophy 41 (1):1-21.
Joel Martinez (2011). Is Virtue Ethics Self-Effacing? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (2):277-288.
Jennie Louise (2004). Relativity of Value and the Consequentialist Umbrella. Philosophical Quarterly 54 (217):518–536.
Ben Bradley (2005). Virtue Consequentialism. Utilitas 17 (3):282-298.
Michael Moriarty (2011). Disguised Vices: Theories of Virtue in Early Modern French Thought. Oxford University Press.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads21 ( #58,633 of 548,941 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,511 of 548,941 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
