Foundations of Physics 41 (6):960-981 (2011)
|Abstract||Are the generalizations of classical equilibrium thermodynamics true of self-gravitating systems? This question has not been addressed from a foundational perspective, but here I tackle it through a study of the “paradoxes” commonly said to afflict such systems. My goals are twofold: (a) to show that the “paradoxes” raise many questions rarely discussed in the philosophical foundations literature, and (b) to counter the idea that these “paradoxes” spell the end for gravitational equilibrium thermodynamics|
|Keywords||Self-gravitational Thermodynamics Gravity Statistical mechanics Thermodynamic limit Equilibrium Ensemble equivalence Non-extensive|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Eric Winsberg (2004). Laws and Statistical Mechanics. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):707-718.
Stephen Leeds (2003). Foundations of Statistical Mechanics—Two Approaches. Philosophy of Science 70 (1):126-144.
Bradford Skow (2011). Does Temperature Have a Metric Structure? Philosophy of Science 78 (3):472-489.
David Wallace (2010). Gravity, Entropy, and Cosmology: In Search of Clarity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (3):513-540.
Amit Hagar (2012). Decoherence: The View From the History and the Philosophy of Science. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London A 375 (1975).
Gerhard Ernst & Andreas Hüttemann (eds.) (2010). Time, Chance and Reduction: Philosophical Aspects of Statistical Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.
Lawrence Sklar (1993). Physics and Chance: Philosophical Issues in the Foundations of Statistical Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #44,807 of 722,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #36,645 of 722,836 )
How can I increase my downloads?