David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Environmental Ethics 7 (3):257-275 (1985)
The central and most recalcitrant problem for environmental ethics is the problem of constructing an adequate theory of intrinsic value for nonhuman natural entities and for nature as a whole. In part one, I retrospectively survey the problem, review certain classical approaches to it, and recommend one as an adequate, albeit only partial, solution. In part two, I show that the classical theory of inherent value for nonhuman entities and nature as a whole outlined in part one is inconsistent with a contemporary scientific world view because it assumes the validity of the classical Cartesian partition between subject and object which has been overturned by quantum theory. Based upon the minimalistic Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum theory, I then develop a theory of inherent value which does not repose upon the obsolete subject/object and ancillary fact/value dichotomies. In part three, I suggest that a more speculative metaphysical interpretation of quantum theory--one involving the notion ofreal internal relations anda holistic picture of nature-permits a principle of “axiological complementary,” a theory of “intrinsic”-as opposed to “inherent”-value in nature as a simple extension of ego
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Val Plumwood (1991). Nature, Self, and Gender: Feminism, Environmental Philosophy, and the Critique of Rationalism. Hypatia 6 (1):3 - 27.
Katie McShane (2009). Environmental Ethics: An Overview. Philosophy Compass 4 (3):407-420.
Y. S. Lo (2006). Making and Finding Values in Nature: From a Humean Point of View. Inquiry 49 (2):123 – 147.
Katherine Pettus (1997). Ecofeminist Citizenship. Hypatia 12 (4):132-155.
Similar books and articles
Michael Lockwood (1989). Mind, Brain, and the Quantum. Oxford University Press.
Lori Gruen (2002). Refocusing Environmental Ethics: From Intrinsic Value to Endorsable Valuations. Philosophy and Geography 5 (2):153 – 164.
Damian Cox (1997). On the Value of Natural Relations. Environmental Ethics 19 (2):173-183.
J. Bub (2000). Quantum Mechanics as a Principle Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 31 (1):75-94.
L. Hardy (2003). Probability Theories in General and Quantum Theory in Particular. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 34 (3):381-393.
Peter Miller (1982). Value as Richness: Toward a Value Theory for the Expanded Naturalism in Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 4 (2):101-114.
James Fieser (1993). Callicott and the Metaphysical Basis of Ecocentric Morality. Environmental Ethics 15 (2):171-180.
Michael E. Zimmerman (1988). Quantum Theory, Intrinsic Value, and Panentheism. Environmental Ethics 10 (1):3-30.
J. Baird Callicot (1992). Rolston on Intrinsic Value: A Deconstruction. Environmental Ethics 14 (2):129-143.
J. Baird Callicott (1992). Rolston on Intrinsic Value. Environmental Ethics 14 (2):129-143.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads37 ( #107,111 of 1,793,012 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #281,575 of 1,793,012 )
How can I increase my downloads?