David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (4):747 – 772 (2008)
The role of analogy appears in surprisingly different areas of the first Critique. On the one hand, Kant considered the concept to have a specific enough meaning to entitle the principle concerned with causation an analogy; on the other hand we can find Kant referring to analogy in various parts of the Transcendental Dialectic in a seemingly different manner. Whereas in the Transcendental Analytic, Kant takes some time to provide a detailed (if not clear) account of the meaning of the term ‘analogy’ and his reasons for his employment of it, in the Transcendental Dialectic on the other hand, Kant’s employment of the term seems far less technical. It would seem on the face of it, that Kant has two senses of ‘analogy’: one technical sense reserved for those constitutive principles of the understanding as laid out in the Analytic, and another casual and commonplace use of the term. This picture, although it contains elements of truth, is ultimately misleading. I argue for three claims in this paper. Firstly, I suggest that there can be found in the first Critique a unified conception of analogy. Secondly, I argue that Kant self-consciously differentiated his employment of analogy from the employment that can be found in many early modern philosophers, e.g. Locke. Thirdly, I will tentatively suggest that this interpretation of analogy can aid us in addressing certain contentious areas of transcendental idealism, most notably the account of causation.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Henry E. Allison (2004). Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Yale University Press.
David Hume (1739/2000). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
I. Kant (1984). Critique of Pure Reason. Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Isaac Newton (1999). The Principia: Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy. University of California Press.
David Hume (1975). Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. OUP Oxford.
Citations of this work BETA
Daniel Whistler (2013). Post-Established Harmony: Kant and Analogy Reconsidered. Sophia 52 (2):235-258.
Barbara Gabriella Renzi (2009). A Type Hierarchy of Selection Processes for the Evaluation of Evolutionary Analogies. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):311 - 336.
Barbara Gabriella Renzi (2009). A Type Hierarchy of Selection Processes for the Evaluation of Evolutionary Analogies. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 40 (2):311-336.
Similar books and articles
Mark Pickering (2011). The Systematic Unity of Nature as a Transcendental Illusion. Kantian Review 16 (3):429-448.
Steven Ravett Brown (2000). A Comment on the Mechanism of the Generation of Aesthetic Ideas in Kant's Critique of Judgment. [Journal (Paginated)] (in Press).
Eric Watkins (2004). Kant's Model of Causality: Causal Powers, Laws, and Kant's Reply to Hume. Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):449-488.
John H. Zammito (2003). 'This Inscrutable Principle of an Original Organization': Epigenesis and 'Looseness of Fit' in Kant's Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (1):73-109.
Rainer Stuhlmann-Laeisz (1982). Kategorien, Theoretische Begriffe Und Empirische Bedeutung. Überlegungen Zu Kants Definition Des Wissenschaftsbegriffs. Erkenntnis 17 (3):361-376.
Gregg Osborne (2006). Two Major Recent Approaches to Kant's Second Analogy. Kant-Studien 97 (4):409-429.
Roger M. White (2009). Talking About God: The Concept of Analogy and the Problem of Religious Language. Ashgate Pub. Ltd..
Mark Sacks (2006). Kant's First Analogy and the Refutation of Idealism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 106 (1):113–130.
Dennis Schulting (2009). Kant's Copernican Analogy: Beyond the Non-Specific Reading. Studi Kantiani 22:39-65.
Lucy Allais (2007). Kant's Idealism and the Secondary Quality Analogy. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (3):459-484.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads65 ( #65,802 of 1,906,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #109,654 of 1,906,946 )
How can I increase my downloads?