Le soi et le sens. Soi ethique et soi poetique chez Levinas et Ricoeur

Abstract
Ricœur and Levinas both think the constitution of the subject on the basis of a critique of consciousness. Subjectivity is to think from the proof of a sense that the subject does not constitute, but that requires the subject. Yet Levinas and Ricœur don't achieve this critique in the same way. The aim of this article is to confront these different ways
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index Translate to english
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 13,345
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Annie Larivée (2008). Foucault Contre l'Herméneutique de Soi. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 21:69-78.
Denise Souche-Dagues (2003). De l'utile. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 2 (2):213-231.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-09-02

Total downloads

10 ( #167,973 of 1,679,274 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #183,420 of 1,679,274 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.