|Abstract||The self, Joseph LeDoux tells us, is “the totality of the living organism”. Most disciplines in the natural sciences focus on only one or two levels of organization. Indeed, Dmitri Mendeleev figured out the periodic table of the elements without knowing any of the underlying quantum mechanics or stereochemistry. There are, however, at least a dozen levels of organization within the neurosciences — and, if we use a metaphor, we temporarily create yet another. This leads to considerable confusion and arguments at cross purposes over whether learning is an alteration at the level of gene expression, ion channels, synapses, neurons or circuits. Each neuron has thousands of synapses, which produce currents that summate to form an impulse train. But only rarely is the activity of a single neuron sufficient to cause a perception or trigger an action. Neurons usually act as members of ‘committees’ — what Donald Hebb in 1949 called cellassemblies. Just as in academia, one individual may function in different committees on different occasions. A concept, including any explicit memory that we can talk about, is probably formed by such a committee. Implicit memories (the ones you can’t talk about) are less differentiated — they are part of the ‘feltwork’, together with motivations and emotions, that biases the choice of one’s next act. In this well-written 400-page appreciation of behavioural neuroscience, LeDoux argues that synapses are the seat of self. He says, in effect, that you are your memories; that it is the uniqueness of an array of synaptic strengths that distinguishes one twin from another. Fair enough, but why not instead focus on one’s unique array of ion channels? Or neurons, because a neuron is the closest thing we have to a computational unit (synapses have to reach a threshold before they have any influence at all)? Or one’s unique arrangement of those overlapping, redundant hebbian committees? None of these make for a catchy book title, but relating other things to the synapses proves to be a good way of covering a lot of fascinating material at the overlying levels, including a few updates to LeDoux’s earlier book The Emotional Brain (Simon & Schuster, 1996)..|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Antonino Raffone, Jaap M. J. Murre & Gezinus Wolters (2003). NMDA Synapses Can Bias Competition Between Object Representations and Mediate Attentional Selection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (1):100-101.
Stuart Hameroff (1999). The Neuron Doctrine is an Insult to Neurons. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):838-839.
Jean Pierre Changeux, Philippe Courrège & Antoine Danchin (1973). A Theory of the Epigenesis of Neuronal Networks by Selective Stabilization of Synapses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 70 (10):2974-8.
Yingxu Wang, Dong Liu & Ying Wang (2003). Discovering the Capacity of Human Memory. Brain and Mind 4 (2):189-198.
Johan J. Bolhuis (1997). Learning, Development, and Synaptic Plasticity: The Avian Connection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):559-560.
E. N. Miranda (1997). How Good Are Formal Neurons for Modelling Real Ones? Acta Biotheoretica 45 (2).
Linda Palmer, Evidence That Long-Term Potentiation Occurs Within Individual Hippocampal Synapses During Learning.
Lyman A. Page (2007). Synapses, Schizophrenia, and Civilization: What Made Homo Sapient? Zygon 42 (3):767-778.
J. E. Pablo-Gopar (2012). Synapses to Myocardium. Medical Humanities 38 (2):e8-e8.
Louise Kay (2010). Imaging Firing Synapses. Philosophy of Photography 1 (1):55-57.
James Brorson (2003). Synapses (Review). Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 46 (4):600-602.
Bhavin R. Sheth (2005). Memory Consolidation During Sleep: A Form of Brain Restitution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (1):81-82.
Added to index2010-12-22
Total downloads5 ( #160,544 of 551,112 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,341 of 551,112 )
How can I increase my downloads?