Graduate studies at Western
Environmental Ethics 14 (2):129-143 (1992)
|Abstract||Central to Holmes Rolston’s Environmental Ethics is the theoretical quest of most enviromnental philosophers for a defensible concept of intrinsic value for nonhuman natural entities and nature as a whole. Rolston’s theory is similar to Paul Taylor’s in rooting intrinsic value in conation, but dissimilar in assigning value bonuses to consciousness and self-consciousness and value dividends to organic wholes andelemental nature. I argue that such a theory of intrinsic value flies in the face of the subject/object and fact/value dichotomies of the metaphysical foundations of modem science—a problem Rolston never directly confronts. The modern scientific world view is obsolete. A post-modem scientific world view provides for a range of potential values in nature actualizable upon interaction with consciousness. The bestthat a modem scientific world view can provide are subject-generated—though not necessarily subject-centered—values in nature|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
J. Baird Callicot (1992). Rolston on Intrinsic Value: A Deconstruction. Environmental Ethics 14 (2):129-143.
Christopher J. Preston (1998). Epistemology and Intrinsic Values: Norton and Callicott's Critiques of Rolston. Environmental Ethics 20 (4):409-428.
Theodore W. Nunez (1999). Rolston, Lonergan, and the Intrinsic Value of Nature. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1):105 - 128.
Keekok Lee (1996). The Source and Locus of Intrinsic Value: A Reexamination. Environmental Ethics 18 (3):297-309.
J. Baird Callicott (1985). Intrinsic Value, Quantum Theory, and Environmental Ethics. Environmental Ethics 7 (3):257-275.
Wayne Ouderkirk (1999). Can Nature Be Evil?: Rolston, Disvalue, and Theodicy. Environmental Ethics 21 (2):135-150.
Francisco Benzoni (1996). Rolston's Theological Ethic. Environmental Ethics 18 (4):339-352.
Nathan Kowalsky (2006). Following Human Nature. Environmental Ethics 28 (2):165-183.
John Mizzoni (2002). Against Rolston's Defense of Eating Animals. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):125-131.
Philip J. Ivanhoe (2010). Of Geese and Eggs. Environmental Ethics 32 (1):67-78.
Katie McShane (2007). Rolston's Theory of Value. In Christopher J. Preston and Wayne Ouderkirk (ed.), Nature, Value, Duty: Life on Earth with Holmes Rolston, III. Springer.
Lori Gruen (2002). Refocusing Environmental Ethics: From Intrinsic Value to Endorsable Valuations. Philosophy and Geography 5 (2):153 – 164.
Mark Wynn (1999). Natural Theology In an Ecological Mode. Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):27-42.
Ben A. Minteer (2001). Intrinsic Value for Pragmatists? Environmental Ethics 23 (1):57-75.
Paul Schollmeier (1997). Why We Love the Land. Ethics and the Environment 2 (1):53 - 65.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads8 ( #131,909 of 738,633 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,778 of 738,633 )
How can I increase my downloads?