David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Health Care Analysis 7 (2):115-129 (1999)
Despite the international interest in priority setting as an important tool for health policy, there has been comparatively little interest in the setting of research priorities. One of the few places where there has been such an interest is at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the United States. Under pressure from Congress to explain its priority setting process, the NIH has tried to explain the criteria and process it uses. The NIH procedure is described, and the problems created by the criteria it uses are analyzed. Although it uses the language of priority setting, it is uncertain whether it does have a real method of setting priorities. Nonetheless, despite the lack of a method, the results of its work are lauded. In the long run, however, NIH will need a more rigorous method of setting priorities
|Keywords||methodology NIH politics priorities rationality|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Lindsay M. Sabik & Reidar K. Lie, Priority Setting in Health Care: Lessons From the Experiences of Eight Countries.
L. Kapiriri (2012). Priority Setting in Low Income Countries: The Roles and Legitimacy of Development Assistance Partners. Public Health Ethics 5 (1):67-80.
Peter A. Ubel (1999). The Challenge of Measuring Community Values in Ways Appropriate for Setting Health Care Priorities. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (3):263-284.
Alberto Infante (1995). Setting Priorities in the Spanish Health Care System. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6):595-606.
Jaime C. Montoya (2008). The Philippine National Health Research System (PNHRS), Setting Health Research Priorities. In Angeles Tan-Alora (ed.), Introduction to Health Research Ethics: Philippine Health Research Ethics Board. Philippine National Health Research System.
Donna L. Dickenson (1999). Can Medical Criteria Settle Priority-Setting Debates? The Need for Ethical Analysis. Health Care Analysis 7 (2):131-137.
Doug Martin & Peter Singer (2003). A Strategy to Improve Priority Setting in Health Care Institutions. Health Care Analysis 11 (1):59-68.
Per-Erik Liss (2003). The Significance of the Goal of Health Care for the Setting of Priorities. Health Care Analysis 11 (2):161-169.
Meri Koivusalo (2010). Common Health Policy Interests and the Shaping of Global Pharmaceutical Policies. Ethics and International Affairs 24 (4):395-414.
Rui Nunes & Guilhermina Rego (2014). Priority Setting in Health Care: A Complementary Approach. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 22 (3):292-303.
John McKie, Rosalind Hurworth, Bradley Shrimpton, Jeff Richardson & Catherine Bell (2013). Priority Setting and Patient Adaptation to Disability and Illness: Outcomes of a Qualitative Study. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis (3):1-17.
Craig Blinderman (2009). Palliative Care, Public Health and Justice: Setting Priorities in Resource Poor Countries. Developing World Bioethics 9 (3):105-110.
Tom L. Beauchamp, Hope R. Ferdowsian & John P. Gluck (2012). Where Are We in the Justification of Research Involving Chimpanzees? Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 22 (3):211-242.
Wendy Baldwin & Belinda Seto (1997). Peer Review: Selecting the Best Science. [REVIEW] Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (1):11-17.
David B. Resnik (2001). Setting Biomedical Research Priorities: Justice, Science, and Public Participation. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (2):181-204.
Added to index2010-09-02
Total downloads5 ( #229,635 of 1,102,846 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #182,775 of 1,102,846 )
How can I increase my downloads?