Should endangered species have standing? Toward legal rights for listed species
Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (2):317-352 (2009)
| Abstract | This article has no associated abstract. (fix it) | |||||||||
| Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,709 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesIan A. Smith (2010). The Role of Humility and Intrinsic Goods in Preserving Endangered Species. Environmental Ethics 32 (2):165-182.
David H. Bennett (1986). Triage as a Species Preservation Strategy. Environmental Ethics 8 (1):47-58.
Lilly-Marlene Russow (1981). Why Do Species Matter? Environmental Ethics 3 (2):101-112.
J. Baird Callicott (2009). The Convergence Hypothesis Falsified: Implicit Intrinsic Value, Operational Rights, and de Facto Standing in the Endangered Species Act. In Ben A. Minteer (ed.), Nature in Common?: Environmental Ethics and the Contested Foundations of Environmental Policy. Temple University Press.
Rick O.’Neil (1997). Intrinsic Value, Moral Standing, and Species. Environmental Ethics 19 (1):45-52.
Rick O.’Neil (1997). Intrinsic Value, Moral Standing, and Species. Environmental Ethics 19 (1):45-52.
G. E. Varner (1987). Do Species Have Standing? Environmental Ethics 9 (1):57-72.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-06-25Total downloads69 ( #12,635 of 549,638 )Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,397 of 549,638 )How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
