Wimsatt and the robustness family: Review of Wimsatt’s Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings [Book Review]

Biology and Philosophy 26 (2):281-293 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This review of Wimsatt’s book Re-engineering Philosophy for Limited Beings focuses on analysing his use of robustness, a central theme in the book. I outline a family of three distinct conceptions of robustness that appear in the book, and look at the different roles they play. I briefly examine what underwrites robustness, and suggest that further work is needed to clarify both the structure of robustness and the relation between it various conceptions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-03-24

Downloads
207 (#93,616)

6 months
37 (#95,980)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brett Calcott
University of Sydney

Citations of this work

Robustness Analysis as Explanatory Reasoning.Jonah N. Schupbach - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (1):275-300.
Model robustness as a confirmatory virtue: The case of climate science.Elisabeth A. Lloyd - 2015 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49:58-68.
Robustness Analysis as Explanatory Reasoning.Jonah N. Schupbach - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (1):275-300.
Robustness and reality.Markus I. Eronen - 2015 - Synthese 192 (12):3961-3977.

View all 33 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The strategy of model-based science.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 2006 - Biology and Philosophy 21 (5):725-740.
Robustness Analysis.Michael Weisberg - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):730-742.

Add more references