A Logical Account of Formal Argumentation

Studia Logica 93 (2/3):109 - 145 (2009)
In the current paper, we re-examine how abstract argumentation can be formulated in terms of labellings, and how the resulting theory can be applied in the field of modal logic. In particular, we are able to express the (complete) extensions of an argumentation framework as models of a set of modal logic formulas that represents the argumentation framework. Using this approach, it becomes possible to define the grounded extension in terms of modal logic entailment
Keywords abstract argumentation  argument labellings  modal logic  grounded semantics
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 22,046
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Dov M. Gabbay (2009). Fibring Argumentation Frames. Studia Logica 93 (2/3):231 - 295.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Dov M. Gabbay (2009). Fibring Argumentation Frames. Studia Logica 93 (2/3):231 - 295.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Robert A. Kowalski & Francesca Toni (1996). Abstract Argumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):275-296.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

38 ( #113,287 of 1,934,430 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

7 ( #76,845 of 1,934,430 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.