A Logical Account of Formal Argumentation

Studia Logica 93 (2/3):109 - 145 (2009)
Abstract
In the current paper, we re-examine how abstract argumentation can be formulated in terms of labellings, and how the resulting theory can be applied in the field of modal logic. In particular, we are able to express the (complete) extensions of an argumentation framework as models of a set of modal logic formulas that represents the argumentation framework. Using this approach, it becomes possible to define the grounded extension in terms of modal logic entailment
Keywords abstract argumentation  argument labellings  modal logic  grounded semantics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 9,365
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Dov M. Gabbay (2009). Fibring Argumentation Frames. Studia Logica 93 (2/3):231 - 295.
Citations of this work BETA
Dov M. Gabbay (2009). Fibring Argumentation Frames. Studia Logica 93 (2/3):231 - 295.
Similar books and articles
Robert A. Kowalski & Francesca Toni (1996). Abstract Argumentation. Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):275-296.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-11-21

Total downloads

23 ( #63,411 of 1,089,063 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #69,801 of 1,089,063 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.