Comments on: Mark Woodhouse, A New Epiphenomenalism?
Australasian Journal of Philosophy 52 (August):170-173 (1974)
| Abstract | This Article does not have an abstract | |||||||||
| Keywords | Body Epiphenomenalism Metaphysics Minds Woodhouse, M | |||||||||
| Categories | ||||||||||
| Options |
|
|||||||||
Download options| PhilPapers Archive |
Upload a copy of this paper Check publisher's policy on self-archival Papers currently archived: 5,875 |
| External links |
 |
| Through your library | Configure |
Similar books and articlesNeil Campbell (2001). What Was Huxley's Epiphenomenalism? Biology and Philosophy 16 (3):357-375.
Amir Horowitz (1999). Is There a Problem in Physicalist Epiphenomenalism? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (2):421-34.
Mark B. Woodhouse (1970). Selves and Minds: A Reply to Professor Knox. Religious Studies 6 (3):263 - 272.
John Lachs (1963). The Impotent Mind. Review of Metaphysics 17 (December):187-99.
Dieter Birnbacher (1988). Epiphenomenalism as a Solution to the Ontological Mind-Body Problem. Ratio 1 (1):17-32.
Wilbur Long (1953). Comments on the Alleged Proof of Epiphenomenalism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 3 (February):355-58.
Mark Eli Kalderon (1987). Epiphenomenalism and Content. Philosophical Studies 52 (July):71-90.
Neil Campbell (2005). Explanatory Epiphenomenalism. Philosophical Quarterly 55 (220):437-451.
John Lachs (1963). Epiphenomenalism and the Notion of Cause. Journal of Philosophy 60 (March):141-45.
Mark B. Woodhouse (1974). A New Epiphenomenalism? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 52 (August):163-69.
Analytics
Monthly downloads |
Added to index2009-01-28Total downloads7 ( #134,983 of 556,895 )Recent downloads (6 months)0How can I increase my downloads? |
My notes
Discussion
