Perspectives on Science 17 (1):pp. 26-57 (2009)
|Abstract||According to the standard view, the so-called ‘Copenhagen interpretation’ of quantum mechanics originated in discussions between Bohr and Heisenberg in 1927, and was defended by Bohr in his classic debate with Einstein. Yet recent scholarship has shown Bohr’s views were never widely accepted, let alone properly understood, by his contemporaries, many of whom held divergent views of the ‘Copenhagen orthodoxy’. This paper examines how the ‘myth of the Copenhagen interpretation’ was constructed by situating it in the context of Soviet Marxist critique of quantum mechanics in the 1950s and the response by physicists such as Heisenberg and Rosenfeld.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
A. A. Pechenkin (2002). Mandelstam's Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics in Comparative Perspective. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 16 (3):265 – 284.
John G. Cramer (1988). An Overview of the Transactional Interpretation. International Journal of Theoretical Physics 27 (227):1-5.
Paul K. Feyerabend (1968). On a Recent Critique of Complementarity: Part I. Philosophy of Science 35 (4):309-331.
Alisa Bokulich (2008). Paul Dirac and the Einstein-Bohr Debate. Perspectives on Science 16 (1):103-114.
Norwood Russell Hanson (1959). Five Cautions for the Copenhagen Interpretation's Critics. Philosophy of Science 26 (4):325-337.
John G. Cramer (1986). The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics 58 (3):647-687.
Ravi Gomatam (2007). Niels Bohr's Interpretation and the Copenhagen Interpretation—Are the Two Incompatible? Philosophy of Science 74 (5):736-748.
Don Howard (2004). Who Invented the “Copenhagen Interpretation”? A Study in Mythology. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):669-682.
Added to index2009-01-31
Total downloads93 ( #9,033 of 722,722 )
Recent downloads (6 months)4 ( #20,343 of 722,722 )
How can I increase my downloads?