Graduate studies at Western
Law and Philosophy 2 (3):339 - 370 (1983)
|Abstract||What are legal fictions? Professor Lon Fuller discussed the matter at some length. One interpretation of his answer is this: they are lies that are not intended to deceive. This solution fails, in the end, to be convincing. But some remarks of Fuller provide the clue to another way of looking at the problem: fictions are means of changing the application of the law by relying on a tension between two classifications of fact.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Eric Miller (1997). Literary Fictions and As-If Fictions. Philosophy and Rhetoric 30 (4):428 - 442.
Hans Vaihinger (1935/1965). The Philosophy of 'as If': A System of the Theoretical, Practical and Religious Fictions of Mankind. London, Routledge & K. Paul.
Arthur Fine (2009). Science Fictions: Comment on Godfrey-Smith. Philosophical Studies 143 (1):117 - 125.
Brian Bix (2008). Legal Philosophy in America. In C. J. Misak (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of American Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Colleen Murphy (2005). Lon Fuller and the Moral Value of the Rule of Law. Law and Philosophy 24 (3):239-262.
Robert S. Summers (1984). Lon L. Fuller. Stanford University Press.
Reina Hayaki (2009). Fictions Within Fictions. Philosophical Studies 146 (3):379 - 398.
Lon L. Fuller (1966/1999). The Law in Quest of Itself. Lawbook Exchange.
Stefania Jha (2003). Fuller's Fictions: Ironic or Foul. Social Epistemology 17 (2-3):203-207.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads18 ( #74,535 of 729,710 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 729,710 )
How can I increase my downloads?