From the schematic to the symbolic: the radical possibilities of the imagination in Kant's third Critique
David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
In this thesis it is argued that Kant's Copernican turn depends on his doctrine of the imagination, and that by understanding the role of imagination as symbolic rather than schematic, the resources are provided to show that his critical philosophy has more radical possibilities than those of his post-Kantian critics. To display this, it is first pointed out that the crucial role the imagination plays in Kant's Copernican turn is not fully developed in his first Critique. Next, it is argued that Kant's doctrine of the imagination is not fully realized until the third Critique in which Kant radicalizes his notion of constructivism by introducing a distinction between determinative and reflective judgments. Finally, it is suggested that while Hegel believes that Kant?s idealism is not dynamic enough to support a full-fledged constructivism, in fact, when Kant?s mature doctrine of the imagination is taken into account, this is no longer the case because Kant believes that our particular experiences of the world unfold artistically and creatively according to the work of the imagination. It is suggested, therefore, that in many ways Kant anticipates the developments of thinkers such as Hegel and other post- Kantians and may even continue to lie beyond them
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library||
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mary Domski (2010). Kant on the Imagination and Geometrical Certainty. Perspectives on Science 18 (4):409-431.
Rudolf A. Makkreel (1990). Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. University of Chicago Press.
Sarah L. Gibbons (1994). Kant's Theory of Imagination: Bridging Gaps in Judgement and Experience. Oxford University Press.
Emilia Angelova (2009). A Continuity Between the A and B Deductions of the Critique. Idealistic Studies 39 (1/3):53-69.
David Morris (2008). Reversibility and Ereignis: On Being as Kantian Imagination in Merleau-Ponty and Heidegger. Philosophy Today 52 (Supplement):135-143.
Scott Jenkins (2011). Hegel on Space: A Critique of Kant's Transcendental Philosophy. Inquiry 53 (4):326-355.
Garth W. Green (2007). Fichte's Critique of Kant's Doctrine of Inner Sense. Idealistic Studies 37 (3):157-178.
Jane Kneller (2007). Kant and the Power of Imagination. Cambridge University Press.
Tracey Stark (1992). Book Review of Rudolf M. Makkreel Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment: Review: Rudolf M. Makkreel, Imagination and Interpretation in Kant: The Hermeneutical Import of the Critique of Judgment. The University of Chicago Press: Chicago and London, 1990. $24.95. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Social Criticism 18 (1):111-118.
Alexander Rueger & Sahan Evren (2005). The Role of Symbolic Presentation in Kant's Theory of Taste. British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):229-247.
Gaven Kerr (2011). Kant's Transcendental Idealism. International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (2):195-222.
Paul Guyer (1997). Kant and the Claims of Taste. Cambridge University Press.
Added to index2011-02-14
Total downloads9 ( #159,507 of 1,102,742 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #296,833 of 1,102,742 )
How can I increase my downloads?