Graduate studies at Western
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):271 – 287 (2005)
|Abstract||In this paper, I argue that Heisenberg's mature philosophy of quantum mechanics must be understood in the context of his epistemological project to reinterpret and redefine Kant's notion of the a priori. After discussions with Weizsäcker and Hermann in Leipzig in the 1930s, Heisenberg attempted to ground his interpretation of quantum mechanics on what might be termed a 'practical' transformation of Kantian philosophy. Taking as his starting point, Bohr's doctrine of the indispensability of classical concepts, Heisenberg argued that concepts such as space, time and causality can be regarded as 'practically a priori', in so far as they remain the conditions for the possibility of experience and even of 'objective reality', though they are not universal and necessary in a strictly Kantian sense. We cannot avoid using classical concepts in the description of experiments in quantum theory, despite the fact that there are limits to their applicability. Such concepts are, for Heisenberg, historically contingent, yet indispensable in our time, because we have no other language through which we can describe and conceive of the interaction between 'object' and 'measuring device'.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Eamonn Healy (2011). Heisenberg's Chemical Legacy: Resonance and the Chemical Bond. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 13 (1):39-49.
Maarten Van Dyck (2003). The Roles of One Thought Experiment in Interpreting Quantum Mechanics. Werner Heisenberg Meets Thomas Kuhn. Philosophica 72 (3):79-103.
Guido Bacciagaluppi & Elise Crull (2009). Heisenberg (and Schrödinger, and Pauli) on Hidden Variables. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 40 (4):374-382.
Kristian Camilleri (2009). Heisenberg and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics : The Physicist as Philosopher. University of Melbourne.
Alisa Bokulich (2004). Open or Closed? Dirac, Heisenberg, and the Relation Between Classical and Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (3):377-396.
Kristian Camilleri (2009). Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation. Perspectives on Science 17 (1):pp. 26-57.
Kristian Camilleri (2007). Indeterminacy and the Limits of Classical Concepts: The Transformation of Heisenberg's Thought. Perspectives on Science 15 (2):178-201.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads43 ( #30,760 of 722,949 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,949 )
How can I increase my downloads?