David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Perspectives on Science 15 (2):178-201 (2007)
: This paper examines the transformation which occurs in Heisenberg's understanding of indeterminacy in quantum mechanics between 1926 and 1928. After his initial but unsuccessful attempt to construct new quantum concepts of space and time, in 1927 Heisenberg presented an operational definition of concepts such as 'position' and 'velocity'. Yet, after discussions with Bohr, he came to the realisation that classical concepts such as position and momentum are indispensable in quantum mechanics in spite of their limited applicability. This transformation in Heisenberg's thought, which centres on his theory of meaning, marks the critical turning point in his interpretation of quantum mechanics
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Mara Beller (1988). Experimental Accuracy, Operationalism, and Limits of Knowledge – 1925 to 1935. Science in Context 2 (1).
Niels Bohr (1928). The Quantum Postulate and the Recent Development of Atomic Theory. Nature 121:580--590.
Kristian Camilleri (2006). Heisenberg and the Wave–Particle Duality. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 37 (2):298-315.
Alexei Kojevnikov (2002). The Last Century of Physics. Annals of Science 59 (4):419-422.
Scott Tanona (2004). Uncertainty in Bohr's Response to the Heisenberg Microscope. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (3):483-507.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Alfred Landé (1962). The Case Against Quantum Duality. Philosophy of Science 29 (1):1-6.
Eamonn Healy (2011). Heisenberg's Chemical Legacy: Resonance and the Chemical Bond. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 13 (1):39-49.
Holm Tetens (1986). “Ist Die Quantenphysik Vollständig?”. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 17 (1):96-118.
Kristian Camilleri (2009). Heisenberg and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics : The Physicist as Philosopher. University of Melbourne.
Michel Bitbol (2001). Non-Representationalist Theories of Knowledge and Quantum Mechanics. SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):37-61.
Maarten Van Dyck (2003). The Roles of One Thought Experiment in Interpreting Quantum Mechanics. Werner Heisenberg Meets Thomas Kuhn. Philosophica 72 (3):79-103.
Alisa Bokulich (2004). Open or Closed? Dirac, Heisenberg, and the Relation Between Classical and Quantum Mechanics. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (3):377-396.
Kristian Camilleri (2009). Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation. Perspectives on Science 17 (1):pp. 26-57.
Kristian Camilleri (2005). Heisenberg and the Transformation of Kantian Philosophy. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 19 (3):271 – 287.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads55 ( #33,734 of 1,413,446 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #154,636 of 1,413,446 )
How can I increase my downloads?