Methodological suggestions from a comparative psychology of knowledge processes

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 2 (1-4):152 – 182 (1959)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Introductory Abstract Philosophers of science, in the course of making a sharp distinction between the tasks of the philosopher and those of the scientist, have pointed to the possibility of an empirical science of induction. A comparative psychology of knowledge processes is offered as one aspect of this potential enterprise. From fragments of such a psychology, methodological suggestions are drawn relevant to several chronic problems in the social sciences, including the publication of negative results from novel explorations, the operational diagnosis of dispositions, the status of aggregates of persons as social entities, and the validation of psychological tests

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-04

Downloads
76 (#210,613)

6 months
14 (#154,299)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The nature of explanation.Kenneth James Williams Craik - 1943 - Cambridge,: Cambridge University Press.
The Problem of Knowledge.Alfred Jules Ayer - 1956 - New York,: Harmondsworth.
Experimental Psychology.Robert S. Woodworth - 1940 - Mind 49 (193):63-72.
Social Theory and Social Structure.Lawrence Haworth - 1961 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (44):345-346.
Design for a Brain.W. Ross Ashby - 1953 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 4 (14):169-173.

View all 39 references / Add more references