Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):596-597 (2000)
|Abstract||The strategic pluralism model depends upon pathogen prevalence and environmental hardship being independent. Evidence is presented that they are positively correlated. The rise in short-term mating strategy in the United States is better explained by changes in the operational sex ratio than by increases in pathogen prevalence. Nonetheless, in highlighting the advantages of a high-investment strategy to less attractive males, Gangestad & Simpson's model helps to clarify the dynamics of frequency-dependent selection.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Steven W. Gangestad & Jeffry A. Simpson (2000). The Evolution of Human Mating: Trade-Offs and Strategic Pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):573-587.
Jim McKnight & Nigel Bond (2000). Unrestricted Women's Sexuality or Opportunism? Quasi-Mathematical Asides on Gangestad and Simpson's Strategic Female Pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):612-613.
Philip Cafaro (2010). Patriotism as an Environmental Virtue. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (1-2):185-206.
Steven Mithen (2000). Evolution of Mating Strategies: Evidence From the Fossil and Archaeological Records. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):615-616.
Lynn Carol Miller, William C. Pedersen, Allison R. Johnson & Anila D. Putcha (2000). For the Short-Term: Are Women Just Looking for a Few Pair of Genes? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):614-615.
John Archer & Mani Mehdikhani (2000). Strategic Pluralism: Men and Women Start From a Different Point. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):588-588.
R. Elisabeth Cornwell, Craig T. Palmer & Hasker P. Davis (2000). More Women (and Men) That Never Evolved. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):598-599.
Elizabeth M. Hill (2000). Conditional Mating Strategies Are Contingent on Return From Investment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):605-606.
April L. Bleske & David M. Buss (2000). A Comprehensive Theory of Human Mating Must Explain Between-Sex and Within-Sex Differences in Mating Strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):593-594.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads1 ( #291,386 of 722,836 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?