Ratio 21 (1):1–12 (2008)
|Abstract||In this paper I argue that warrant for Lewis' principle of recombination presupposes warrant for a combinatorial analysis of intrinsicality, which in turn presupposes warrant for the principle of recombination. This, I claim, leads to a vicious circularity: warrant for neither doctrine can get off the ground.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Daniel Nolan (1996). Recombination Unbound. Philosophical Studies 84 (2-3):239 - 262.
Klaus Jaffe (2000). Emergence and Maintenance of Sex Among Diploid Organisms Aided by Assortative Mating. Acta Biotheoretica 48 (2).
Ross P. Cameron (2007). Lewisian Realism: Methodology, Epistemology, and Circularity. Synthese 156 (1):143 - 159.
M. Eddon (2011). Intrinsicality and Hyperintensionality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (2):314-336.
Frank Hofmann (2006). Truthmaking, Recombination, and Facts Ontology. Philosophical Studies 128 (2):409-440.
Theodore Sider (2009). Williamson's Many Necessary Existents. Analysis 69 (2):250-258.
David Efird (2008). What is the Principle of Recombination? Dialectica 62 (4):483-494.
George Darby & Duncan Watson (2010). Lewis's Principle of Recombination: Reply to Efird and Stoneham. Dialectica 64 (3):435-445.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads41 ( #32,659 of 722,871 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #60,917 of 722,871 )
How can I increase my downloads?