Revolution, Event and Theory of the Act. Arendt, Badiou and Žižek

Ideas Y Valores 59 (144):99–116 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article explores the question of the political meaning of the term “revolution” and the relation that has been established and should continue to be established between revolution and freedom. To this effect, the article examines some of the main proposals set forth in this respect by three contemporary thinkers, Hannah Arendt, Alain Badiou and Slavoj Žižek, with occasional references to Michel Foucault and Antonio Negri. The proposal argued for here is that Arendt’s notion of revolution and the notions of event and act put forth in the radical political theories of Badiou and Žižek intersect and necessarily supplement one another.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-02-13

Downloads
27 (#557,528)

6 months
6 (#431,022)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Subject and Power.Michel Foucault - 1982 - Critical Inquiry 8 (4):777-795.
Badiou: A Subject to Truth.Peter Hallward - 2003 - Univ of Minnesota Press.
Is it useless to revolt?Michel Foucault & James Bernauer - 1981 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 8 (1):2-4.

Add more references