Online research in philosophy

Abstract Richard Rorty has devised a highly distinctive strategy for resisting what Michel Foucault once denounced as ?the blackmail of the Enlightenment,? according to which one is forced to take a stand either for or against it. Rorty distinguishes between the liberal political values of the Enlightenment, which he embraces ?unflinchingly,? and its universal philosophical claims about truth, reason and nature, which he completely renounces. Rorty argues that Enlightenment values are not sustained by ?Enlightenment? metaphysics, and can therefore survive the loss of faith in those metaphysics. But Rorty implausibly believes that the scope and limits of his ironism can be restricted to realist metaphysics; he fails to qualify his views on the relationship of theory to practice in several decisive ways; and his ?ethnocentric? defense of Enlightenment anti?ethnocentrism is plagued by paradoxes and other problems.

An expanded and updated edition of this classic collection.

The purpose of this article is to explore the relationship between the thought of Richard Rorty and that of his former teacher, Charles Hartshorne. There are important similarities between the two, but ultimately the differences are more readily apparent, especially in terms of the battle between poetry (in the wide sense of the term conceived by Rorty) and (Hartshornian) metaphysics. Hartshorne is defended against Rorty.