Reply to Rey [Book Review]
Philosophical Studies 126 (1):155 - 162 (2005)
|Abstract||Rey does not try to achieve an overall statement of the view he is discussing; rather, he fastens on to a series of individual passages in Reference and Consciousness and expresses disagreement with each of them. Most of his complaints rest on imprecision in his understanding of the relevant passage. To make it easier to match my responses to the detail of Rey’s comments, I have organized my responses to the four sections of his article under the same headings as he uses.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Jerry A. Fodor & Ernest LePore (1993). Precis of Holism: A Shopper's Guide. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (3):637-682.
Dunja Jutronić (2005). Chomsky Amongst the Philosophers. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):423-431.
Ernest LePore & Jerry A. Fodor (1993). Reply to Critics. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (3):673-682.
Ksenija Puškarić (2005). Rey and the Projectivist Account. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 5 (3):441-445.
Georges Rey (2005). Explanation, Not Experience: Commentary on John Campbell,Reference and Consciousness. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 126 (1):131 - 143.
Georges Rey (1986). A Question About Consciousness. In Herbert R. Otto & James A. Tuedio (eds.), Perspectives on Mind. Kluwer.
John Campbell (2005). Review: Reply to Rey. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 126 (1):155 - 162.
David Woodruff Smith (1987). Rey Cogitans: The Unquestionability of Consciousness. In Herbert R. Otto & James A. Tuedio (eds.), Perspectives on Mind. Kluwer.
Gerhard Schurz (2001). Pietroski and Rey on Ceteris Paribus Laws. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 52 (2):359Ð370.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads5 ( #170,048 of 722,935 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #61,087 of 722,935 )
How can I increase my downloads?