David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Classical Quarterly 45 (02):540- (1995)
Virgil, in his description of the establishment of a new city by Aeneas for those Trojans who wished to remain in Sicily, is thinking of the Roman practice of colonial foundation: ‘Meanwhile Aeneas marked out the city with the plough and allocated the houses ’. We may note the personal role of the founder, the ploughing of the ritual first furrow, the organized grants to the settlers and the equality of treatment implied in the use of lot . Virgil was writing at the end of the first century B.C. at a time of great activity in land distribution, but the Romans had been founding colonies from the mid fourth century. Each colony involved the creation of an urban area and the settlement of people on the surrounding agricultural land, and so perpetuated the city state, which was central to ancient life and culture. Indeed a colony was a smaller image of Rome itself. In the early Republic, colonies, either of Latins or of Roman citizens, were established on the periphery of Roman territory, largely for military and strategic reasons. Between 200 and 173 B.C. more than 40,000 may have received plots of land, amounting to about 1,000 square miles of territory. Later, the motives for colonial foundations became more complex, being closely connected with increasing economic and political problems. There can have been few more important aspects in the development of colonies than the need to find land for discharged troops. These in the main were rank and file soldiers who would expect equal shares in land allocations
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
S. Cuomo (2000). Divide and Rule: Frontinus and Roman Land-Surveying. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (2):189-202.
Similar books and articles
W. Warde Fowler (1912). The Text of the Corpus Agrimensorum Die Handschriften des Corpus Agrimensorum Romanorum. Dr. Von C. Thulin. Berlin: Reimer, 1911. Zur Überlieferungsgeschichte des Corpus Agrimensorum. Von C. Thulin. Göteborg, 1911. Humanistische Handschriften des Corpus Agrimensorum. Von C. Thulin. (Rheinisches Museum Für Philologie, 1911). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 26 (08):267-268.
A. Treloar (1952). Åke Josephson: Casae Litterarum. Studien Zum Corpus Agrimensorum Romanorum. Pp. Xx + 316; 5 Plates. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1950. Paper.Casae Litterarum. Opuscula Ex Corpore Agrimensorum Romanorum Selecta Recensuit Et Germanice Vertit Åke Josephson. Pp. 27, 5 Plates. Uppsala: Almqvist & Wiksell, 1951. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 2 (3-4):231-232.
W. Warde Fowler (1914). Corpus Agrimensorum Romanorum: Vol. I. Fasc. 1. Recensuit Carolus Thulin. Leipzig: Teubner. M. 7. The Classical Review 28 (03):108-109.
C. Bailey (1923). De Romanorum Piaculis De Romanorum Piaculis. By S. P. C. Tromp, S.J. One vol. Large 8vo. Pp viii + 158. Leyden: G. F. Théonville, 1921. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 37 (3-4):81-82.
Susan Orpett Long (2000). Public Passages, Personal Passages, and Reluctant Passages: Notes on Investigating Cancer Disclosure Practices in Japan. Journal of Medical Humanities 21 (1):3-13.
Richard Sosis (2004). Insights From Ifaluk: Food Sharing Among Cooperative Fishers. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (4):568-569.
C. C. (1887). Passages for Translation Into Latin Prose. With an Introduction by H. Nettleship, M.A., Corpus Professor of Latin in the University of Oxford. Bell & Sons. 1887. 3s. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 1 (09):279-280.
Mark A. Pitt & Yun Tang (2013). What Should Be the Data Sharing Policy of Cognitive Science? Topics in Cognitive Science 5 (1):214-221.
Joan E. Sieber (1991). Openness in the Social Sciences: Sharing Data. Ethics and Behavior 1 (2):69 – 86.
J. D. Craig (1931). Oratorum Romanorum Fragmenta Oratorum Romanorum Fragmenta. By H. Malcovati. Turin: Paravia, 1930. 3 Vols. Pp. Ii+249; 219; 214. 54 L. For the Three Vols. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 45 (05):182-183.
L. D. Barnett (1898). Carter's De Deorum Romanorum Cognominibus De Deorum Romanorum Cognominibus Quaestiones Selectae, scr. Jesse Benedictus Carter. Pp. 64. 8vo. Leipzig, Teubner. 1898. M. 2. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 12 (09):462-463.
William Ferraiolo (1996). Individualism and Descartes. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):71-86.
Marc Froment Meurice (2009). Habeas Corpus. Derrida Today 2 (1):66-83.
Michaele L. Ferguson (2013). Sharing Democracy. Oxford University Press.
Sheila Lintott (2007). Ethically Evaluating Land Art: Is It Worth It? Ethics, Place and Environment 10 (3):263 – 277.
Added to index2010-12-09
Total downloads6 ( #461,743 of 1,796,303 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #283,262 of 1,796,303 )
How can I increase my downloads?