Tapping Habermas's Discourse Theory for Environmental Ethics

Environmental Ethics 31 (4):339-357 (2009)
Although other quasi-Kantian theories have been adapted, Jürgen Habermas’s discourse theory has been largely ignored in discussions of environmental ethics. Indeed on some versions of what an environmental philosophy must entail, Habermas’s anthropocentric approach must be disqualified from the start. Yet, there are some environmentally friendly implications of his discourse theory. They may not give us everything we would wish, but in the contemporary political context we must treasure any moral theory that can draw on the still-extensive theoretical and political resources of liberalism
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.5840/enviroethics200931440
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 15,974
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Max Pensky (2005). Jürgen Habermas, Existential Hero? Radical Philosophy Review 8 (2):197-209.
Bastiaan van der Linden (2012). Discursively Prioritizing Stakeholder Interests. Business and Professional Ethics Journal 31 (3-4):419-439.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

15 ( #172,086 of 1,725,822 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #166,958 of 1,725,822 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.