David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):102–123 (2006)
I argue for a version of the causal analysis of seeing which I call the 'potential information' analysis. I proceed initially by considering some standard causal analyses, those of Tye and Jackson. I show that these analyses are too weak, for they allow cases of hallucination to count as seeing. I argue that what is central to seeing is that our visual experiences provide a means of gaining true beliefs about objects. This, however, does not mean that we must actually gain true beliefs about objects in any particular case. Rather, what must be the case is that a perceiver of our sort could gain true beliefs about objects on the basis of experiences like ours. I defend this analysis against various objections, making important qualifications to it as I do so
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
Roderick M. Chisholm (1957). Perceiving: A Philosophical Study. Cornell University Press.
Frank Jackson (1977). Perception: A Representative Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Kendall Walton (1984). Transparent Pictures: On the Nature of Photographic Realism. Noûs 18 (1):67-72.
David Lewis (1980). Veridical Hallucination and Prosthetic Vision. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58 (September):239-249.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
C. Ricotta & G. C. Avena (2002). On the Information-Theoretical Meaning of Hill's Parametric Evenness. Acta Biotheoretica 50 (1):63-71.
Kenneth Einar Himma (2007). The Concept of Information Overload: A Preliminary Step in Understanding the Nature of a Harmful Information-Related Condition. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 9 (4):259-272.
David Wendler & Christine Grady (2008). What Should Research Participants Understand to Understand They Are Participants in Research? Bioethics 22 (4):203–208.
David M. Holley (1998). Information Disclosure in Sales. Journal of Business Ethics 17 (6):177-187.
Robert Stalnaker (2009). Iterated Belief Revision. Erkenntnis 70 (2):189 - 209.
Stephan Verschoor & Szilvia Biro (2011). Primacy of Information About Means Selection Over Outcome Selection in Goal Attribution by Infants. Cognitive Science 36 (4):714-725.
Edward H. Spence & Aaron Quinn (2008). Information Ethics as a Guide for New Media. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 23 (4):264 – 279.
Adedayo O. Adeyemi & M. H. Ayegboyin (2005). The Use of Information and Communication Technologies for Providing Access to HIV/AIDS Information Management in a Resource-Poor Country. International Corporate Responsibility Series 2:393-400.
Réjane Bernier (1986). Self-Organizing Potential and Morphogenetic Potential (Comparing Current Embryological and Atlan's Views). Acta Biotheoretica 35 (3):163-183.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #194,523 of 1,726,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #147,227 of 1,726,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?