The promise of feminist reflexivities: Developing Donna Haraway's project for feminist science studies
Hypatia 19 (1):162-182 (2004)
|Abstract||: This paper explores models of reflexive feminist science studies through the work of Donna Haraway. The paper argues that Haraway provides an important account of science studies that is both feminist and constructivist. However, her concepts of "situated knowledges" and "diffraction" need further development to be adequate models of feminist science studies. To develop this constructivist and feminist project requires a collective research program that engages with feminist reflexivity as a practice|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Sue V. Rosser (1987). Feminist Scholarship in the Sciences: Where Are We Now and When Can We Expect A Theoretical Breakthrough? Hypatia 2 (3):5 - 17.
Sandra G. Harding (ed.) (2004). The Feminist Standpoint Theory Reader: Intellectual and Political Controversies. Routledge.
Carla Fehr (2012). Feminist Engagement with Evolutionary Psychology. Hypatia 27 (1):50-72.
Lisa Weasel (2001). Dismantling the Self/Other Dichotomy in Science: Towards a Feminist Model of the Immune System. Hypatia 16 (1):27-44.
Geoffrey Gorham (1995). The Concept of Truth in Feminist Sciences. Hypatia 10 (3):99 - 116.
Sharyn Clough (2004). Having It All: Naturalized Normativity in Feminist Science Studies. Hypatia 19 (1):102-118.
Margret Grebowicz (2005). Consensus, Dissensus, and Democracy: What Is at Stake in Feminist Science Studies? Philosophy of Science 72 (5):989-1000.
Martha McCaughey (1993). Redirecting Feminist Critiques of Science. Hypatia 8 (4):72 - 84.
Donna Jeanne Haraway (1998/2000). How Like a Leaf: An Interview with Thyrza Nichols Goodeve. Routledge.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #87,931 of 549,077 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #63,317 of 549,077 )
How can I increase my downloads?