The unjustified-suffering argument for vegetarianism
Graduate studies at Western
|Abstract||A major argument for vegetarianism is that eating animals causes unjustified suffering. While this argument has been articulated by several people, it has received surprisingly little attention. Here I restate it in a way that I believe is most convincing, considering and rejecting the two main justifications for causing suffering in order to eat animals. I compare it to some other prominent arguments for vegetarianism, and discuss a major objection to the argument which focuses on whether the animals would not exist if not bred to be eaten.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|External links||This entry has no external links. Add one.|
|Through your library||Only published papers are available at libraries|
Similar books and articles
Andy Lamey (2007). Food Fight! Davis Versus Regan on the Ethics of Eating Beef. Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (2):331–348.
Jonathan Harrison (2008). The Vagaries of Vegetarianism. Ratio 21 (3):286-299.
David Boonin-Vail (1993). The Vegetarian Savage. Environmental Ethics 15 (1):75-84.
Matthew Calarco (2004). Deconstruction is Not Vegetarianism: Humanism, Subjectivity, and Animal Ethics. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 37 (2):175-201.
David Boonin-Vail (1993). The Vegetarian Savage: Rousseau's Critique of Meat Eating. Environmental Ethics 15 (1):75-84.
Richard Hanley (2004). A Modest Proposal. Public Affairs Quarterly 18.
Cathryn Bailey (2007). We Are What We Eat: Feminist Vegetarianism and the Reproduction of Racial Identity. Hypatia 22 (2):39-59.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads38 ( #35,862 of 722,946 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?