Graduate studies at Western
Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan (2011)
|Abstract||The paper discusses some changes in Bolzano's definition of mathematics attested in several quotations from the Beyträge, Wissenschaftslehre and Grössenlehre: is mathematics a theory of forms or a theory of quantities? Several issues that are maintained throughout Bolzano's works are distinguished from others that were accepted in the Beyträge and abandoned in the Grössenlehre. Changes are interpreted as a consequence of the new logical theory of truth introduced in the Wissenschaftslehre, but also as a consequence of the overcome of Kant's terminology, and of the radicalization of Bolzano's anti‐Kantianism. Bolzano's evolution is understood as a coherent move, once the criticism expressed in the Beyträge on the notion of quantity is compared with a different and larger notion of quantity that Bolzano developed already in 1816. This discussion is enriched by the discovery that two unknown texts mentioned by Bolzano in the Beyträge can be identified with works by von Spaun and Vieth respectively. Bolzano's evolution is interpreted as a radicalization of the criticism of the Kantian definition of mathematics and as an effect of Bolzano's unaltered interest in the Leibnizian notion of mathesis universalis. As a conclusion, the author claims that Bolzano never abandoned his original idea of considering mathematics as a scientia universalis, i.e. as the science of quantities in general, and suggests that the question of ideal elements in mathematics, apart from being a main reason for the development of a new logical theory, can also be considered as a main reason for developing a different definition of quantity.|
|Keywords||quantity mathematics Bolzano mathesis universalis Kant logic|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Paul Rusnock (2011). Kant and Bolzano on Logical Form. Kant-Studien 102 (4):477-491.
Bernard Bolzano (1973). Theory of Science. Boston,D. Reidel Pub. Co..
Clinton Tolley (2012). Bolzano and Kant on the Place of Subjectivity in a Wissenschaftslehre. Grazer Philosophische Studien 85 (1):63-88.
Paul Rusnock & Mark Burke (2011). Etchemendy and Bolzano on Logical Consequence. History and Philosophy of Logic 31 (1):3-29.
Clinton Tolley (2012). Bolzano and Kant on the Nature of Logic. History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (4):307-327.
Johan Benthem (1985). The Variety of Consequence, According to Bolzano. Studia Logica 44 (4):389 - 403.
Stefania Centrone (2011). Strenge Beweise Und Das Verbot der Metábasis Eis Állo Génos. History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (1):1 - 31.
Paul Rusnock (2013). On Bolzano's Concept of a Sum. History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (2):155 - 169.
Andrej Krause (2006). Are Bolzano's Substances Simple? American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 80 (4):543-562.
Paul Rusnock (2012). Remarks on Bolzano's Conception of Necessary Truth. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 20 (4):1-21.
Stefania Centrone (2011). Das Problem der Apagogischen Beweise in Bolzanos Beyträgen Und Seiner Wissenschaftslehre. History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (2):127 - 157.
Jocelyn Benoist (2002). La réécriture par Bolzano de l'Esthétique transcendantale. Revue de Métaphysique Et de Morale 3:287-303.
Dariusz Lukasiewicz (2007). Logical and Metaphysical Assumptions of Bernard Bolzano's Theodicy. Forum Philosophicum 12 (1):33 - 56.
Benjamin Schnieder (2007). Mere Possibilities: A Bolzanian Approach to Non-Actual Objects. Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (4):525-550.
Added to index2012-11-03
Total downloads76 ( #13,120 of 739,344 )
Recent downloads (6 months)19 ( #6,782 of 739,344 )
How can I increase my downloads?