Ratio Juris 22 (2):171-186 (2009)
|Abstract||Abstract. The purpose of this paper is to address some of the main issues of contemporary jurisprudential methodology by considering the contribution of Jules Coleman to this subject. After a description of Coleman's methodological approach and a clarification of its philosophical background, the paper focuses on some related problems, such as the relation between linguistic meaning and conceptual content, the nature of legal concepts, the different aspects of the normativity of content, and the revisability of conceptual truths.|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
T. M. Crowther (2006). Two Conceptions of Conceptualism and Nonconceptualism. Erkenntnis 65 (2):245-276.
Alex Byrne (2005). Perception and Conceptual Content. In Ernest Sosa & Matthias Steup (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Epistemology. Blackwell.
Jules L. Coleman (2001). The Practice of Principle: In Defence of a Pragmatist Approach to Legal Theory. Oxford University Press.
Christopher B. Gray (2010). The Methodology of Maurice Hauriou: Legal, Sociological, Philosophical. Rodopi.
Damiano Canale (2012). Looking for the Nature of Law: On Shapiro's Challenge. Law and Philosophy 31 (4):409-441.
Robert Hanna & Monima Chadha (2011). Non-Conceptualism and the Problem of Perceptual Self-Knowledge. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):184-223.
Oliver E. Williamson (2009). Pragmatic Methodology: A Sketch, with Applications to Transaction Cost Economics. Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (2):145-157.
Stefanie Grüne (2011). Is There a Gap in Kant's B Deduction? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (3):465 - 490.
Stephen Perry (2009). Beyond the Distinction Between Positivism and Non-Positivism. Ratio Juris 22 (3):311-325.
Added to index2009-06-16
Total downloads11 ( #99,484 of 549,066 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?