Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:89-101 (2002)
|Abstract||In this paper, I will analyze Charles S. Peirce’s “A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God.” I want to argue for two conclusions: 1) that Peirce’s conception of spontaneous conjectures of instinctive reason allows for a rationally justified belief in the reality of God; and 2) that this belief is not the result of a sound argument or even a complete argument and thus is not a secure belief. This paper is divided into three parts. First, I will explain some Peircean philosophical notions that are essential background information for a genuine understanding of the neglected argument. Second, I will present a sketch of Peirce’s three stages of inquiry and explain each stage’s relevance to the neglected argument. Finally, I will analyze Peirce’s first stage of inquiry, also known as the humble argument for the reality of God, and show how this incomplete argument can provide a rationally justified belief in the reality of God|
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||No categories specified (fix it)|
|Through your library||Configure|
Similar books and articles
Bernardo Canteñs (2004). Overcoming the Evidentialist's Challenge: Peirce's Conjectures of Instinctive Reason and the Reality of God. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 40 (4):771 - 786.
Charles G. Conway (2008). The Normative Sciences at Work and Play. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (2):pp. 288-311.
Elizabeth Salas (2009). Abduction and the Origin of “Musement”. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4):459-471.
John R. Shook (2011). Peirce's Pragmatic Theology and Stoic Religious Ethics1. Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (2):344-363.
Jeffrey H. Sims (2008). A Fallible Groom in the Religious Thought of C.S. Peirce – a Centenary Revisitation. Sophia 47 (2).
Hermann Deuser & Dennis Beach (1995). Hume's Pragmaticist Argument for the Reality of God. Journal of Speculative Philosophy 9 (1):1 - 13.
Jaime Nubiola (2004). Il Lume Naturale: Abduction and God. Semiotiche 1 (2):91-102.
Dennis Kohatyn (1982). Resurrecting Peirce's "Neglected Argument" for God. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 18 (1):66 - 74.
Kathleen Hull (2005). The Inner Chambers of His Mind: Peirce's "Neglected Argument" for God as Related to Mathematical Experience. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 41 (3):483 - 513.
Robert B. Talisse (2001). On the Supposed Tension in Peirce's “Fixation of Belief”. Journal of Philosophical Research 26:561-569.
Greg Janzen (2011). Is God's Belief Requirement Rational? Religious Studies 47 (4):465-478.
Bowman L. Clarke (1977). Peirce's Neglected Argument. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 13 (4):277 - 287.
Oded Balaban & Asnat Avshalom (1990). The Ontological Argument Reconsidered. Journal of Philosophical Research 15:279-310.
Douglas R. Anderson (1990). Three Appeals in Peirce's Neglected Argument. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 26 (3):349 - 362.
Robert Stern (2007). Peirce, Hegel, and the Category of Secondness. Inquiry 50 (2):123 – 155.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Added to index2011-12-01
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?