Peirce and the Spontaneous Conjectures of Instinctive Reason

Abstract
In this paper, I will analyze Charles S. Peirce’s “A Neglected Argument for the Reality of God.” I want to argue for two conclusions: 1) that Peirce’s conception of spontaneous conjectures of instinctive reason allows for a rationally justified belief in the reality of God; and 2) that this belief is not the result of a sound argument or even a complete argument and thus is not a secure belief. This paper is divided into three parts. First, I will explain some Peircean philosophical notions that are essential background information for a genuine understanding of the neglected argument. Second, I will present a sketch of Peirce’s three stages of inquiry and explain each stage’s relevance to the neglected argument. Finally, I will analyze Peirce’s first stage of inquiry, also known as the humble argument for the reality of God, and show how this incomplete argument can provide a rationally justified belief in the reality of God
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
 
Download options
PhilPapers Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 10,316
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Similar books and articles
Charles G. Conway (2008). The Normative Sciences at Work and Play. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 44 (2):pp. 288-311.
Elizabeth Salas (2009). Abduction and the Origin of “Musement”. International Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4):459-471.
Dennis Kohatyn (1982). Resurrecting Peirce's "Neglected Argument" for God. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 18 (1):66 - 74.
Bowman L. Clarke (1977). Peirce's Neglected Argument. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 13 (4):277 - 287.
Douglas R. Anderson (1990). Three Appeals in Peirce's Neglected Argument. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 26 (3):349 - 362.
Analytics

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-12-01

Total downloads

2 ( #319,394 of 1,096,448 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #134,922 of 1,096,448 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Start a new thread
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.